• A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I suspect, just by looking at the current market regarding microsd cards, that anything smaller than 64gb would actually be MORE expensive than the 64gb. going from 64 -> 32gb adds 2ct/gb, going down to 16 adds nearly 3ct/gb in addition, and i suspect that they would love to price the smaller cards even higher because the margin must be pretty tight by now if i compare the prices with what they were a few years back.

    Also, production for smaller sizes has probably shifted down dramatically in the last years when i look at availability.

    • missingno@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Cost/gb doesn’t matter if you’re not using the excess space, so that’s not really the right way to look at it. Suppose a 64gb cart costs $5, 32gb costs $4, and 16gb costs $3. If a game only needs 16gb, they’d save $2, regardless of the /gb.

      And of course, Switch 1 carts are still being manufactured in those sizes. Not like they’re halting all production of S1 titles overnight.

      • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Hmmm thats another way to look at it, you might be right.

        But game sizes are getting larger and larger - at least in the AA - AAA area; Maybe Nintendo doesn’t want to get locked into a contract for a good that might not be useable? logistics might also be a reason, not having to handle one more type of cartridge.