• haloduder@thelemmy.clubBannedBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Dictators aren’t immediately bad and democracies aren’t immediately good.

    Since most people are dumb as shit and are being herded like sheep, it requires individuals who can resist the influence of the crowd to fix problems the crowd has been conditioned to allow.

    In the case of El Salvador, since whatever they were doing before wasn’t working, they now need to deal with an alternative that works better.

    They only have themselves and the people sucking off their gang members to blame.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I think time takes care of the “indefinition” part of the problem. people can help that too.

  • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    “90% of developed countries allow the indefinite reelection of their head of government, and no one bats an eye. But when a small, poor country like El Salvador tries to do the same, suddenly it’s the end of democracy.”

    The difference is those governments usually have civil liberties etc that constrain the government. (The erosion of which is partly why trump is so concerning.)

    Bukele has been arresting journalists and politicians he doesn’t like. If you are arrested you effectively have no recourse.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      You can literally get arrested for social media posts in Europe. Anybody who’s still pretending that there are some civil liberties in the west is deeply unserious.

      • TheKingBombOmbKiller@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        6 days ago

        What kind of speech posted in social media post do you find it awful that people can get arrested for? One should not escape prosecution for death threats, child pornography or hate speech just because it’s published in the form of a social media post. But I suspect you probably have something closer to a grey area in mind.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          You’re right, it would be entirely idiotic to compare a socialist government dealing with violent extremism by providing education with a fascist regime incarcerating people protesting a genocide it’s conducting.

      • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        6 days ago

        You can literally get arrested for social media posts in Europe.

        And then, as has happened for those cases, you get a trial.

        The people arrested in El Salvador do not get trials. To conflate the two situations is either ignorant or simply childish.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          So if someone gets a trial and is found guilty for making bad posts you do not believe their civil liberties were violated, is that right?

          • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            No.

            I am saying that a country with a functional judiciary is categorically different than one without.

            Saying democratic countries with laws you dislike are the same as a country where the state is unrestrained by law is utter nonsense.

            Edit: To put it very simply, in both places you could be arrested for social media posts. In El Salvador, that could be the last anyone hears of you. In the other, you have a lawyer, a fair trial and if you lose, you still have some human rights.

            I know which I’d prefer.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              19
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              “”“Democratic”“” doing a lot of work there.

              These aren’t democratically popular laws and the people never voted to have these laws put into place. These laws were imposed onto them because their democracy is limited by what they are allowed to even vote for - in the end, there is still a ruling class.

              • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                6 days ago

                Arguing there’s no difference between a regime that disappears citizens and a flawed western democracy is mind bendingly dumb.

                • Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  The west is literally commiting a genocide. They are mass disappearing people into the afterlife. Mind boggling that in 2025 we still have incredulous libs who believe in western exceptionalism.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  The regimes that disappears citizens are western “democracies”. The only thing that’s mind bendingly dumb here is fact that you’re evidently unaware of this fact.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      The civil liberty to be extra-judicially murdered like Fred Hampton or the Ferguson organizers.

    • belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah, and everyone was totally fine with Trump talkimg about a third because, as we know, term limits and democracy only matter in small, poor countries.

          • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            Ha, my bad! Sorry, too many children on this thread posting just absolute nonsense.

            • Samsuma@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 days ago

              “the adults in the room” angle doesn’t even encompass you considering your defense for western “democracies”, fucking ageist.

              Let me guess, GenZ/Y drawing a hard red line on and being vocal about genocide and western interventionism is attributed to their “youthful fervor” that will wane away in time too?

              • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                “the adults in the room” angle doesn’t even encompass you considering your defense for western “democracies”, fucking ageist.

                It’s more that the take being espoused, that there’s no difference between a state that disappears journalists and citizens compared to a Western democracy is a childish take, and to argue it makes you seem a child.

                It’s like when my friend’s adorable toddler asked why she can’t have ice cream “an a broccli” every meal (as she understands vegetables are important.) It’s a reasonable question for a child as we don’t expect her to understand all the nutrition etc that makes that a terrible plan. If she asks it, no worries. If a teenager or older asks, I immediately assume they’re kind of a child.

                Arguing a place that locks up journalists and ‘suspected’ citizens is in the same realm as a western democracy with some laws you don’t like, is a childish position, that you expect from someone with little to no understanding of the role/importance of a judiciary, checks and balances between branches of government or the fourth branch. They likely know and understand little about the many regimes where this has happened and the horrific tragedies that ensue. And fair, not everyone has time to read or the fortune of knowing people who have come from those places. But it is still childishly ignorant.

                Let me guess, GenZ/Y drawing a hard red line on and being vocal about genocide and western interventionism is attributed to their “youthful fervor” that will wane away in time too?

                Huh, where are you getting this from?

                • Samsuma@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  More word-salad that basically amount to patronizing “it’s nuanced” ageism is all I’m reading here, fucking racist age-chauvinist.

                  The others in other threads have clearly expressed their points in great detail as to why Western regimes, currently committing genocide and adding multiple war crimes under their belt, are not “liberating”, “civilized” states upholding “civil liberties”. Applying jurisprudence to regime changes, land-grabbing, enslavement, disappearance, murders and torture and going through court circus to justify their actions doesn’t make them “civilized” or much better than their client states, European settler.