• ShadowRam@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    definitely a perk working from home, you decide temperature/sound/etc.

    But I’m talking from an overall society energy use perspective.

    I’m curious if the energy efficiency of having people in one building compares to the energy efficiency of them spread out.

    It will greatly vary, as some are already in apartment buildings sharing that efficiency, some are in better eff rated homes, some are in worse eff rated homes.

    Not sure this study can accurately claim 54% … even if they said ±10%, it’s still probably way out to lunch.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget about all the useless TVs and monitors running in offices all the time.

      And heating/cooling/lighting all the empty rooms.

      Plus staff for cleaning and security.

      You’re not wrong that it’d be interesting to see some data, but my intuition is offices are extremely wasteful in a lot of ways. I could be wrong though!

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember reading about a study pre-pandemic that found remote work was greatly better from an emissions standpoint than in-office work and it mostly came down to the massive amounts of resources spent commuting, and if I remember correctly it even found the emissions cost of commuting by public transit to be significant enough to see improvement by remote work