After only a few months, Chris Swanson is sick of shopping for houses in what the 39-year-old calls a “dumpster fire” of a market for first-time buyers like himself.

Though he has a steady job and has paid off his student loans, it feels like he’s two decades too late: He missed out on rock-bottom interest rates, and homes are far more expensive. Landing on the one property that will fit his needs and his budget is daunting enough, but there’s also pressure to move fast. “I’m in that weird position,” said Swanson, a marketing professional from Mentor, Ohio.

Homeownership — the main driver of wealth for most Americans — is out of reach for large swaths of the population. But the pinch is most pronounced for millennials, who are buying homes at a slower pace than those before them. Baby boomers, in fact, represented the largest share of home buyers this year — a spot millennials had held since 2014 — according to research by the National Association of Realtors.

“Boomers are absolutely in the driver’s seat,” said Jessica Lautz, deputy chief economist at NAR, because they have built up home equity and can pay in cash. “Unfortunately, that has pushed many millennials to the sidelines.”

Those born between 1981 to 1996 have been called the “unluckiest generation.” Since entering the workforce, they’ve experienced the slowest economic growth of any age group. They’ve also been weighed down by student debt and child-care costs, Lautz said.

Rising interest rates and persistently high asking prices have further eroded their buying power. The median U.S. home sold for $416,100 in the second quarter of 2023, a 26 percent jump since early 2020, Federal Reserve data show. Median sales prices were significantly higher in the Northeast ($789,600) and the West ($547,900).

Meanwhile, the average 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage is now hovering near 7 percent, nearly three times the 2.6 percent recorded in early 2021.

As a result, first-time home buyers are older, with a median age of 36, Lautz said. That’s the oldest since NAR started keeping track in 1981, when it was 29. As the age climbed, she noted, the share of first-time home buyers sank to “historic lows.”

The high interest rates are “a real burden on young people who don’t have the high salaries of old folks like me,” said Joe Gyourko, 67, a professor of real estate at the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School. “You can’t get around it, and you’ve got to make a decision: Do I value the house enough?”

  • whatisallthis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    But like - ok the conglomerations charge too much for rent and then no one can pay it. So then prices would fall right?

    I just don’t get who is ultimately buying this stuff.

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the neat part, the conglomerates have done the math to figure out how much vacancy they can tolerate and still make money with shit ass prices. Then they set up some price collusion to make sure other property owners don’t fuck up the money train.

      Who’s paying? The 25%+ wage earners. Everyone else it’s fucked and sharing bunk beds.

      The only way this changes is a collapse or for law makers to regulate.

      • Melkath@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, in essence, you are telling me that healthcare debt is one of the most solvent types of debt in America, and instead of passing real assets which follow a different set of rules, Boomers are cashing out real assets to pay off unsecured debts, which would have been absolved in the estate proceedings, leaving the real assets to be passed off to the children?

        But Boomers are dumb and greedy, so they are not taking advantage of that just to make sure they can have their mojitos?

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Supply and demand is never so cut-and-dry. People need places to live, even if they are too expensive to afford them. So people team up and live cooperatively. One of my friends went in on a mortgage with another person whom he was on good terms with. They’re not romantically involved or anything, but they live together as co-owners of a house that neither of them could hope to afford on their own in their wildest dreams.

      That’s the lengths that people are getting pushed to these days, and it’s unsustainable, but the real estate conglomerations know exactly where the line is and they always make sure they are butting up against it, but never crossing it.

    • Melkath@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, because lack of vacancy is being made up for by the for profit prisons.

      Did you even try to read my comment?

      They are trying to create a serf/slave class again. The last time they made a serious play was the depression.

    • jcit878@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      its an increasingly small market of buyers and sellers flipping among each other. when enough boomers realise they sold out and can’t buy back in cause they blew their profits on the usual boomer shit, maybe things will change then