Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 10 months agoAmelia Earhart's long-lost plane possibly detected by sonar 16,000 feet underwater, exploration team claimswww.cbsnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square114fedilinkarrow-up1486arrow-down112
arrow-up1474arrow-down1external-linkAmelia Earhart's long-lost plane possibly detected by sonar 16,000 feet underwater, exploration team claimswww.cbsnews.comRapidcreek@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 10 months agomessage-square114fedilink
minus-squareBlackbeard@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·10 months agoIt is quite literally impossible for bones to survive 87 years at the bottom of the ocean. The commenter said: could there still be signs of bodies after all this time? like bones? The answer is an unequivocal “no.” Even the ones from Nikumaroro which were referenced in the video which you quoted, disappeared decades ago. There could absolutely, positively not be bones at this site, because bones at the bottom of the ocean are completely broken down within a few years. I responded with detail because you were clearly mistaken.
minus-squareRedditWanderer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down5·10 months agoWhere did I say there’d be bones at the bottom of the ocean after 87 years? Youre just arguing with yourself at this point.
minus-squareBlackbeard@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·10 months ago There could be bones, as stated in the video.
It is quite literally impossible for bones to survive 87 years at the bottom of the ocean. The commenter said:
The answer is an unequivocal “no.” Even the ones from Nikumaroro which were referenced in the video which you quoted, disappeared decades ago. There could absolutely, positively not be bones at this site, because bones at the bottom of the ocean are completely broken down within a few years. I responded with detail because you were clearly mistaken.
Where did I say there’d be bones at the bottom of the ocean after 87 years? Youre just arguing with yourself at this point.