• kvasir476@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hmm, I seem to recall US Intelligence swearing that Saddam Hussein definitely had WMDs and was definitely about to use them on his own people and we definitely needed to invade Iraq to stop him. US Intelligence is not a fact or truth seeking operation; its purpose is to further American imperial interests all else be damned.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hasn’t the IDF been in control of the hospital for like a month, and are yet to produce any evidence (those 3 rifles and the calendar don’t count)?

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They kidnapped the hospital director and tortured him until he confessed that he was Hamas. That’s way better than video and photo evidence of the huge base they claimed was underneath the hospital.

        Look at this cool video of this 3d animation the IDF made before they started attacking the hospital. That looks more realistic than real life. In fact it looks so realistic that actual video footage wouldn’t do these tunnels justice. Which is why the IDF isn’t providing it.

        You can trust Bidens word. Surely he would never lie about completely unverified ridiculous Zionist claims

    • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They also insisted for years that a baby formula factory was a chemical weapons plant.

    • breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair, they also said Russia was about to invade Ukraine and no one believed them.

      • Jumi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s hard to believe someone’s telling the truth if they lied about almost everything else.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hopefully they’re giving real intel to the decision makers, but anything released to the public is intended for influence purposes. Nothing in their mission requires or even encourages telling the general public true things.

      • dasgoat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They gave the wmd ‘intel’ to lawmakers who were then pressured into supporting the illegal US invasion of Iraq.

        Not much has changed since then. Hell, the Afghanistan Papers detailed how everyone in the intelligence community knew the war was a lost cause, but it still came as a shock to most law makers.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not quite on point. The IC wants the facts. What the political leadership do with those facts is a whole different thing.

    • Critical_Insight@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      One does not really need US intelligence’s confirmation to undestand that the use of human shields is standard operating procedure for islamistic terrorists. It’s not that they don’t care about their own citizens but they simply don’t see getting martyred as a bad thing. Quite the opposite.

      • Candelestine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        To me it comes down to a strategic approach. In how many ways is it possible for Hamas to actually hurt Israel in a significant way? Not very many, even thousands of civilians dead doesn’t genuinely weaken the country much. But they can make Israel hurt themselves, by basically making them go evil and lose their allies.

        Similar to how Bin Laden very much succeeded in his goals for the Sept 11th attack, by getting us to pass the Patriot Act, invade some countries and start ripping ourselves apart imo.

        Regardless, arguing this position on here is going to be like trying to swim up a waterfall. Israel has gone too far, and the hate against them is too strong because of that. The middle of a war is not the time for nuance.

        edit for a qualifier

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        SOP? Sure. Actual case here where a protected target was bombed? Prove it.