“And they hated mortimer because he told the truth”

Harris was a mediocre candidate who ran a dogshit campaign. If the democrats are smart anyone involved in the decision making levels of the campaign should be blacklisted from ever working with the party again.

Nazis and NATO, name a more iconic duo

Almost like the goal isn’t taking out Hamas leadership. Hmmm…

Hmm, I seem to recall US Intelligence swearing that Saddam Hussein definitely had WMDs and was definitely about to use them on his own people and we definitely needed to invade Iraq to stop him. US Intelligence is not a fact or truth seeking operation; its purpose is to further American imperial interests all else be damned.

Yeah, that’s what I don’t understand. I don’t really see any moral distinction between eating dogs/cats/horses vs pigs/cows/chickens. It seems like the only logically consistent positions are to ban it all or allow it all; picking and choosing doesn’t make much sense.

How’s training and cleaning up mold supposed to line the pockets of the senator’s buddy who owns the uniform company?

Two things not mentioned it that article:

1. Why would anyone want to fight for a country that is so callously disinterested in the welfare of it’s citizens?

2. In the last quarter-century it has become extremely apparent that the US Military is not the “global force for good” that it wants to portray itself as. Most young people probably aren’t interested in joining up to commit war crimes in the name of making money for the military industrial complex.

No, bins marked for recycling batteries, phones, etc.

I don’t know if they were/are at every store though.

Used to be bins right inside the door. If they’re gone I’d just ask customer service.

Yes.

Bruh, how can you laugh when the illuminati is shrinking men’s taints?

So more kids are shot where there are more lax gun laws; who could have ever foreseen that?

IMO the difference between this and paparazzi is that you aren’t legally compelled to allow the paparazzi to take photos of you. If paparazzi gets the photos then they’re theirs, but you can at least try to prevent them from taking them.

US copyright law is unsalvageably fucked

Yes

I get that the copyright is traditionally held by the photographer and not the subject. I guess the issue I have with it is how Trump (or anyone charged with a crime) is legally compelled to allow it to be created.

Also, if we assume Fulton County Jail owns the copyright, could they sell mugshot merch? If yes, that’s horrifically dystopian. If no, are they entitled to claw back any money made from the sale of mugshot merch?

Personally, I would like to live in the world where jails can’t profit off the mugshots of their inmates.

deleted by creator

You hate to defend Trump, but that’s absolutely fucked. As far as I know you can’t refuse a mugshot, so you’re essentially compelled to release the rights to your likeness if you’re charged with a crime. I could see the logic if you’re convicted (under the 13th, which is still fucked), but that’s crazy before a trial/guilty verdict.

Anyway, just a layman’s take. Would love to hear what an actual lawyer has to say.