https://www.wisconsin.edu/regents/about-the-regents/karen-walsh/
A master’s in journalism who’s involved in broadcasting. What qualifies her to be president of the board? My guess is millions in mommy and daddy’s money.
Since 2006, the foundation has awarded more than $8 million dollars in grants in the State of Wisconsin, including a gift to the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics that created the BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine.
There’s your answer
Honestly, universities overreacting to porn is getting very tired now.
Ya they respond prematurely, get overexcited, and spew loads of idiotic proportions. It is no longer virgin ground to make pornographic videos. They need to grow a massive amount and stop gaping their holes.
Man, if his wife is as attractive as he is that’s gonna make for some great porn.
Talk about a humblebrag amirite!
Only in Wisconsin 💀💀💀
… Florida is asking you to hold their
beerjello shots.These stories pop up all over, even liberal states.
If you work in education having a side job as a sex worker is probably going to get you fired when it gets out, regardless of location.
True. Most people have enough sense not to get caught. But I’d also assume that he didn’t do it for money, per se, where the school teachers you normally hear about are.
Keep in mind this guy was administrative and ceremonial, not educational or academic. It’s unlikely many students knew him as anything more than a guy that gave lame speeches at stuff they were supposed to attend.
I personally think it’s an unethical reason to fire someone. But I think our culture still is very ashamed of sex work and I do understand how businesses and education administors would want to avoid the PR of having someone on staff that’s also a sex worker.
I don’t agree that it’s ethical. But I do understand the reasoning behind it.
it depends on the job.
If one is the janitor, or a professor, whatever. If you’re literally the face of an organization (this guy), then this guy’s extracurricular activities being socially unacceptable (even if we’re puritanical prudes) impacts the reputation of that organization; and it’s a perfectly acceptable to swap out your representative for a fresh babyface when the old one turns.
