• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Hrmmmm, wonder what could be causing that?

    a) Microplastics

    b) Increase in CO2 in the lower atmosphere

    c) Runoff and chem dumping

    d) Horrible diets and processed foods

    e) Increasing temps at ground level

    f) All of the above

    • PodPerson@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Aaaaannndddd, if you’re in the US:

      g) Expensive healthcare

      h) Administration turning their backs on science

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      Or just, like, humans have difficulty living to 100 regardless, and we’d need a major medical breakthrough to continue improving?

      Don’t overthink it.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The reality of living over 100 is that most of the studies on ageing are just poorly done. Epidemiologists are a meme to the biomedical research community. These are the clowns that triggered the Mediterrean diet, the Okinowa diet, etc. without validating the ages of the people being studied. A decade later: people live longer in regions of Greece or Italy because of familes engaged in pension fraud, and Japanese longetivity was tied to poor record restoration by the US army. One guy figured out people >100 in Japan somehow were born on the 1st or 15th of every month.

        https://www.japantimes.co.jp/life/2024/12/25/lifestyle/lifespan-japan-data/

        • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I once got downvoted to hell on Reddit for pointing this out. People really want to live long, and there’s a lot of motivated reasoning around it.

      • Balder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, I think the biggest cause was actually not groundbreaking stuff, but our understanding of microorganisms and our changes in hygiene (all summarized in better education).

        The fact we treat many diseases now helps, but I think it makes for a much smaller percentage.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think the biggest cause was actually not groundbreaking stuff, but our understanding of microorganisms and our changes in hygiene (all summarized in better education).

          Vaccines. Antibiotics. Cardiac drugs.

          All now no longer researched.

  • ushmel@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You don’t generally want to live much past 80. It just gets worse and worse.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      That also very much depends on yourself and how you eat and how you exercise.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Eh, when I was a kid, someone who’s 70 seemed ancient.

      Now I’m halfway there, and either I’m biased or there’s more people of like shy of 80 still doing things.

      Celebrities are clearly somewhat functional even at older ages.

      Harrison Ford is still acting at 83.

      So I’d say it’s probably more or less up to what sort of care you have. Celebrities clearly will have a bit more than the average person.

  • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    But I was told that the first human to live to 200 has already been born! Futurists are never wrong.