illusionist@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 month agoChild labour with 10 years of experience, 'AI-native' accepting 250k lines of Cursor codelemmy.mlimagemessage-square199linkfedilinkarrow-up1776arrow-down115 cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
arrow-up1761arrow-down1imageChild labour with 10 years of experience, 'AI-native' accepting 250k lines of Cursor codelemmy.mlillusionist@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 month agomessage-square199linkfedilink cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
minus-squareModern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up36·1 month agoI am trying to imagine how bad that library must have been before for this to be better.
minus-squareOpisek@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·1 month agoWell, you see, it’s better because it has 250,000 lines of code. Bigger number means better.
minus-squareBatadon@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 month agoYeah, before that it did the exact same thing in 3000 lines of code, which was obviously worse!
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoThis is literally how CEOs think.
minus-squareModern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoMore lines of code mean harder to hack right… right? :)
I am trying to imagine how bad that library must have been before for this to be better.
Well, you see, it’s better because it has 250,000 lines of code. Bigger number means better.
Yeah, before that it did the exact same thing in 3000 lines of code, which was obviously worse!
This is literally how CEOs think.
More lines of code mean harder to hack right… right? :)