And yet again, basically nothing for violating child labor laws.

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      All fines should be proportional to gross revenue.

      If your business is fined, it should cut deep, anything else isn’t a punishment

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        My take on this is that any and all revenue that can be identified as the product of the crime should be automatically forfeit. The fine should be assessed in addition to the lost revenue. Profiting from crime shouldn’t be allowed, and getting caught should be too much risk for it to be worthwhile.

        If losing the revenue threatens the existence of your business, that’s too effing bad.

  • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The laws are being repealed in some states and going unenforced/under-enforced in others because the owner’s capital batteries are too poor and correctly pessimistic to make new capital batteries, and our owners won’t allow that to hurt their profit generation. Enter creative labor pool solutions.

    Same reason abortion privileges are being revoked. A destitute, unwanted child will make a model desperate capital battery.

    Labor. Consume. Breed.

  • Neato@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We need corporate death sentences. If a corporation is liable for a certain number of deaths (either over time or per incident), a certain amount of environmental damage, or violating laws like human trafficking, child labor, etc, then that corporate should have it’s charter revoked. It shouldn’t be allowed to keep existing and be forced to sell off assets.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If corporations are people too, they should be put in prison. No conducting business for one year. If your company caused deaths, your company is now in trial and executed if found guilty. Company gutted and victims paid out.

  • FlowVoid@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Up to 800 incidents when an employee illegally worked more than the maximum hours.

    So that’s over $300 per incident, which means the extra hours were not worth it.

    • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, still worth it. Probably cost less than hiring multiple people and training them. Probably even got away with paying less per hour than someone who can work more hours legally too.

      • FlowVoid@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s $300+ per illegal shift. Which does not seem worth it to me, regardless of how much the employee was paid.

        • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It likely costs them a whole lot more to hire multiple people. There are more costs associated with employees than just wage. Thats why turnover costs money. And a few dollars more per hour over three years over how many people in their 20 locations?

          This is likely a wash for them compared to hiring more people or paying more to get older people.

          Let’s bear in mind this is by far the smallest fine they’ve been hit with for child labor and they keep doing it. I can’t imagine their accountants are that bad.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They are always worth it, unless you get caught. Since getting caught is unlikely, and the fine for getting caught is paltry, it just makes sense in capitalist land to keep doing it.