Technobros and a tenuous understanding of how the real world works, name a more iconic duo.
I checked the original post text 3 separate times because I was so convinced Elon Musk wrote it. It sounds like this dude is Elon Musk on an alt account, it’s so eerily similar to how he talks about technology.
His YouTube shorts (500/day goal) is videos of Elon musk saying things, with the background music alternating between the sigma male tune and the movie clip tune.
Did you see how ELON MUSK OWNED💯 DON LEMON by getting flustered at the question of “half your advertisers have left the platform, if X fails, isn’t that on you?” so he told Don he should choose his words carefully because the interview clock only had 5 minutes left? And then Don was OWNED because he rephrased the question?
LMAO. SUCK IT CNN. OWNED!
This is the kind of person who thinks you can grow and sell a million tomatoes in one year. It’s all about “the hustle” - physics and reality be damned.
You can grow a million tomatoes alright, what you can’t do is sell them:
- 30% will be misshapen, so you’ll have to throw them away
- 40% will have some blemish, arrive a day too late to the market, or just be the wrong color and no shop will buy them… but you might be lucky and sell ½ of them for katchup and similar, so that’s another 20% getting thrown away
- 10% (⅕ of the remaining ones) will not get chosen by buyers, and go bad, so… whatever, that’s the shop’s problem now 😁!
Congrats, you just sold 500 thousand tomatoes!
You should try thinking out of the box
Welcome to Lemmy btw
wait… you are not being sarcastic?
Sounds like something Elon Musk would say.
Don’t even bother rebuilding the bridge, my imaginary hover train will be even cheaper and faster.
He already had a circlejerk with another poster talking about how China can do it in days (because no osha, you know), and then! said it could also be done more inexpensively by reusing the steel from the collapsed bridge, that, you know, is structurally compromised by the collapse and I can’t imagine the water it’s submerged in is good for its integrity either
Every time I hear someone say AI, I know for sure they have no idea what they’re talking about and are about to grift people
That’s a great instinct to have in the current landscape, but keep in mind the rise of machine learning is happening. And there are a few really cool and good use-cases for it. So it might be a hindrance to yourself to automatically throw out anything to do with “AI”, you might find something cool to use it for.
For instance, as a hobbyist graphic designer, I use a local instance of Stable Diffusion these days instead of Photoshop to make quick photo edits, saving me hours of manually masking out objects and filling in the blanks.
It’s ok. 99% of the AI articles are about how AI is going to kill us all with the proof being the movie Terminator.
Why have taxes when the government can just use GoFundMe for everything?
Taxes are not american. Fundraisers are. Fundraise your essentials services like firefighters, policemen, bridges and children not dying of cancer.
And is that huge 3D printer in the room with us now?
To be fair, you don’t need a very huge 3D printer for that, if you divide it into a lot of smaller parts which can be assembled later.
Idk, if we can already print steel though and whether we can make it structually sufficiently stable.
So our proposal is we prefab a bunch of metal pieces and assemble them on-site?
As opposed to our current method where we carve bridges out of a big block of metal?
Hahahaha absolutely. :D The difference is, that they come from a 3D printer and that’s cool.
shakily points to an Etch-a-Sketch
Unfortunately it’ll take 10 years to build the printer.
And even then, the filament needed at this scale will take another several years, and a few days for shipping.
Also, it doesn’t do well in sunlight or high humidity for prolonged periods of time, so we’ll need maybe 20 to 30 years to work out a solution for that problem.
I can only assume they’re trying to talk about concrete 3D printing, but oh boy is that not ready for anything which needs strength.
How weak are we talking? All I’ve seen is the press releases from the companies that do it.
.
Yeah, but how much worse than normal unreinforced concrete? (Which is actually fine if you aren’t worried about tension)
Oh it should be roughly equivalent. But really, what besides a slab can you build without worrying about tension?
I love theory, it can completely sidestep reality and sell a solution nonetheless. It works in theory!
Welcome to the field of Economics
Economics: Explaining tomorrow why the predictions of yesterday didn’t come true today.
Somehow, and I know this is a strange thing to say, but I’m not buying it.
Rule #1
Never get high on your own supply
Rule #2
See Rule 1
So uh… how exactly does a 3D printer use AI? Is the AI running the stepper motors? Or is this person actually suggesting that an AI could design a bridge? Because, uh, no. No it can’t. Maybe someday in the distant future, but large language models aren’t structural engineers. Those aren’t even remotely the same thing.
Large Language Models aren’t the only type of AI. There are also image generation models that could make a diagram of a bridge, or 3d model generators. Not saying they would do a perfect job, though.
Did you actually even read the article you linked? It’s about a type of generative AI that’s slightly better than humans at finding the most efficient way of providing structural strength with minimal material. If you think that’s all there is to designing a bridge I can only hope you aren’t allowed anywhere near a bridge I need to drive across.
Did you read it to the bottom? They’re using 3D printing to build the organic shapes and have already done so to build space vehicles, airplane parts and dune buggies. It also mentions where parts are too complex to manufacture, they ask the AI to account for it and break it into components.
If you think people aren’t already using this for civil engineering, then I’ve got a bridge I want to sell to ya.
Generative design isn’t AI. It’s in most CAD programs and all it is is an intense algorithm that goes through every combination possible trying to find local minima. The BBC has no clue what it’s talking about here, it’s not AI. There’s no “asking” it anything.
This is like saying that LLMs are not AI, they’re just incremental probabilities to determine what the next most probable word is in a sequence of word combinations.
Machine learning is machine learning.
Since when is generative design machine learning? It’s finding local minimus not machine learning.
This is true… However, the printed bridge is only 1 foot in length and made out of plastic.
He did specify a large 3D printer. So it might be 2 or even 3 feet in length.
There are experimental construction printers that use concrete. Unreinforced, expensive specialty concrete, though, and it looks like they take more than a day to run on something big. And I assume sometimes fail like every other printer.
I’d also like to see the pitch on GoFundMe. “Yeah, we actually do have tax collection powers, but we thought it’d be better if you specifically paid for this. Lines are open”
Edit: Wait, are we talking about the bridge? Lol, so this is a kilometers-long bridge that has to float in a bay on a kilometers-long barge, and get lifted into place and fixed to an existing, differently constructed bridge somehow.
The “lifting” is done by hand, while making fake crane noises… then placed onto a map.
“What is this? A bridge for ants?! It has to be… At least 3 times bigger than this!”
This only works if the bridge is financed as an NFT
Good thing 3D prints aren’t weak in at least one axis… wait…
Who funds the Go Fund Me campaign? Certainly not tax payers…
“facts”
Probably spelled “faks” in their mind
Fax
