

👀
https://www.x.org/releases/X11R7.5/doc/man/man1/xeyes.1.html
Xeyes watches what you do and reports to the Boss.
👀
https://www.x.org/releases/X11R7.5/doc/man/man1/xeyes.1.html
Xeyes watches what you do and reports to the Boss.
I find it’s not as reliable in targeting inputs, and you sometimes need to set the XDG_RUNTIME variable yourself. wtype
is much better at this, but is limited to keystrokes
Appreciate the link, and I don’t mean to sound so ungrateful, but that extensive README contains everything except what exactly river
is. Is it a desktop manager? A standalone compositor? What does it fix? What does it replace? etc.
Edit: Oh, it’s a tiling window manager, and all WM in wayland have to be compositors.
AwesomeWM, and xdotool.
That’s it. Oh and x-eyes of course
Gosh I had a few of these around that time. I wish I kept them…
It comes from the Algonquin tribe famous for their musical rhythms and Go coding skills.
Thank you for asking this. Also wondering. It’s just a compositor for wayland right? A compton/picom equivalent?
Seeing so many posts about it, and wondering why.
I use AwesomeWM with Picom, and my idea of what a compositor does is: provide smooth v-synced video playback, and maybe fade a window out gently when I ask it to vanish.
I think compositors are now taking on new animation/interaction roles, where they are getting fancy with screen transitions like scaling/moving/focusing and other than actually managing the windows, are almost becoming Desktop managers themselves.
it feels the opposite for me, but definitely switch and see if the difference sticks
“Let he who is without tab, cast the last grouping”
Ive been camping everywhere, man. Camped in deserts far, man
That, is an excellent skit.
I’ve been battling this myself since I’ve newly transitioned into the world of industry, and it is looney tunes the discussions I’ve been part of: the parts I don’t understand sound like alphabet soup, and the parts I do understand are divorced from reality
I’ve seen this a few times, but this is the first time I noticed he also mentioned Tesla
MP3’s who?
In the very next scene, he exclaims “It’s not even digital!”, but yes I hear you
D was favoured by the New School of Revisionists, who seem to be publishing less and less as their theorems fall flat in the face of the ABC coalition’s triumphs.
It’s just a fad, do not buy into their D-based propaganda
Yes. Reasons: A, B, and C. Not D.
Imagemagick - Explores the magical music of Imogen Heap
datamash - Provides great montages and mashupa of Data’s escapades from Star Trek
https://lemmy.ml/post/29786179/18482468