BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml to Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoNew gender gaplemmy.mlimagemessage-square406linkfedilinkarrow-up1629arrow-down1110
arrow-up1519arrow-down1imageNew gender gaplemmy.mlBuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml to Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square406linkfedilink
minus-squarebanneryear1868@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·2 years agoFT is pretty solid when it comes to data analysis like this. The point is to show a specific trend not to encompass all the data in the sources.
minus-squarePoplar?@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-22 years agoI think they understood “liberal” to mean “classical liberal” which obviously would have the issue they point out. But FT seems to be using “liberal” to mean “progressive” or something like that.
FT is pretty solid when it comes to data analysis like this. The point is to show a specific trend not to encompass all the data in the sources.
I think they understood “liberal” to mean “classical liberal” which obviously would have the issue they point out. But FT seems to be using “liberal” to mean “progressive” or something like that.