fossilesque@mander.xyz to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoPlease recommend your cheaper, reliable SSDs 2TB+ (4TB ideal)message-squaremessage-square47linkfedilinkarrow-up158arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up153arrow-down1message-squarePlease recommend your cheaper, reliable SSDs 2TB+ (4TB ideal)fossilesque@mander.xyz to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square47linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareFarraigePlaisteach@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 years agoI thought that SSD fails “better” than HDD because SDD become read-only first.
minus-squarePostcard64@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·edit-22 years agoOnly when they get to the end of life of the cells. If there’s another failure before that, it’s likely a full failure.
minus-squareFarraigePlaisteach@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoThanks. In that case is it known which of those two possibilities are most likely?
minus-squarecircuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoTo my knowledge, that isn’t a consistent pattern (someone please correct if wrong).
minus-squareFarraigePlaisteach@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoAccording to @postcard64 below I’m oversimplifying things (at minimum).
I thought that SSD fails “better” than HDD because SDD become read-only first.
Only when they get to the end of life of the cells. If there’s another failure before that, it’s likely a full failure.
Thanks. In that case is it known which of those two possibilities are most likely?
To my knowledge, that isn’t a consistent pattern (someone please correct if wrong).
According to @postcard64 below I’m oversimplifying things (at minimum).