• Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Any angle that can be used to criticise or defend something will get used by both people who don’t understand it but are trying to use it in good faith, people who do understand it but misunderstand the situation and misapply it, and people who may or may not understand the thing or situation but use it in bad faith.

    • Orphie Baby@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I hate the word “subjective” now. It absolutely does not mean what most people think it means. And it certainly doesn’t mean that there’s no such thing as objective quality/effectiveness, nor that there’s no such thing as good taste.

      • Asafum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s in opposition to what is objective, I don’t understand how someone could think if one exists the other can’t…

        But I also don’t understand why people were eating Tide pods so…

        • Orphie Baby@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago
          1. You can’t define something with “it’s the opposite of something [that you also haven’t defined properly]”
          2. It’s still not what most people think it is, but
          3. I really don’t want to be forced to open up this can of worms right now. I don’t have the mental energy
          • Iapar@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.