zarp86

I mean, China will still exist and is way better Boogeyman.

If you have to have these laws they should specifically target elective abortions. Not the medical procedure in general.

I understand you are just playing devil’s advocate here, but even this is a bad idea. As we’ve seen in Texas, the law isn’t designed for nuance, it is designed to attack women. The Texas law was supposed to have exceptions for health and safety of the woman/fetus, and we saw how that played out. Having a law that specifically targeted elective abortions would have the same problem where the state would undoubtedly put the burden of proof on the woman. “Oh, your baby has no heartbeat? Fill out this form in triplicate, get your doctor to sign it, have it notarized, and your abortion will be approved in 38 - 40 weeks.”

You are making the bold assumption that Republicans give a damn about not appearing hypocritical.

They didn’t say they had to dig deep.

I’m struggling to think why this would be a thing. The only guess I have is someone was told to enforce “no dictionary words in a password” and saw that as an ‘easier’ way to implement?

Thank you for the great explanation, and for teaching me the word “truthy.”

Easily? Pray tell.