• 1 Post
  • 87 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle






  • where_am_i@sh.itjust.workstoMovies@lemmy.worldThe decline of sex in films
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    20 days ago

    So is peeing and shitting. And yet somehow you don’t get a 5 minute scene of someone on a shitter and then the exact shot of their turds being flushed down.

    Sex and nudity are normal. And yet I don’t wanna watch my friends have sex. Do you? Wierd huh?

    So, why exactly is it so unbelievable that people just don’t wanna watch actors pretend to do the most intimate thing we all got?

    Feels awkward, yes. Feels akward when it’s bad and feels even more awkward when it’s good. And it would be most akward if they actually properly showed the entire process and it was real.


  • where_am_i@sh.itjust.workstoMovies@lemmy.worldThe decline of sex in films
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    The world didn’t do shit.

    It was as normal in Europe to be naked and talk about sex as it is now. Actually, it probably got even a bit more normal.

    Your stupid Hollywood is somehow watched by everyone around the world while it’s produced to cater to your dumb average American. And they’re religious and prudent. And that has been the case since forever. Which is why having naked breasts in your cinema is something wild.

    In the meantime french movies would casually have people full naked every second movie.

    Am I really on a movies community?

    Now, your dumb Hollywood realized their cringe sex scenes aren’t appreciated by about anyone, and so they cut them out. Big deal.

    Definitely not the world shifting, and not even your moronic populace. Proportion of religious prudes is still dropping even in the dumbfuckistan. And yet no more sex in the movies. Go figure.


  • where_am_i@sh.itjust.workstoMovies@lemmy.worldThe decline of sex in films
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    20 days ago

    The disappearance of the sex scene in American cinema, the suppression of the body under the moral imperative of commodities in neoliberal capitalism, and Verhoeven as antagonizer.

    Bro, you gotta stop reading shit like this. It’s bad for your brain. Not everything is capitalistic plot to suppress your whatever.

    Why wouldn’t you be able to see it as “the viewers didn’t enjoy our cringe sex scenes, so we got rid of them, cuz we sure as hell couldn’t put real sex scenes into movies”. And no, not because of purity. But because even good porn is cringe and fake.

    So maybe it’s really a decomcratic decision and it’s only possible because through capitalism there’s monetary pressure on the film industry to do the things people want.

    Whichever it is, you gotta stop reading BS that starts with a conclusion in the first sentence, and no matter the subject it’s the same conclusion: capitalism oppressing the working class. You’d make Lenin cringe.




  • Meh. That exists everywhere.

    If you got a college degree you can move to a lot of places in the US which have a higher HDI and a living standard than almost anything in Europe. And you don’t even need to learn a new language.

    Cry all you want about healthcare, but as a white-collar worker you’ll have a corporate insurance plan and it will be lit. Try some European public healthcare afterwards, that will be a harsh downgrade, I promise.

    You do have a biiig problem is if you’re uneducated and working at McDonald’s or an Amazon warehouse. Cuz then you’re fucked. Like for life. And don’t you dare go unemployed, homeless, or get sick. Cuz, life, apparently can be worse than being an amazon slave, and apparently you won’t ever “recover” (to your previous slave state) from falling that low.

    And, ofc, it’s fun to live in a society like that.

    But you definitely don’t need to personally struggle on a daily basis. Unless by choice.


  • I am sure I am the only one so far who used a “3-sigma-improbable”.

    Everyone else kept talking about electoral college, which means nothing in the context of a popular vote poll.

    To me it seems like you choose to ignore facts.

    Compared to you, I do understand a lot about polls, population samples, sampling methodologies, importance weighting, confidence intervals, and other related stuff. On a level way above high school.

    And I think it’s interesting that you likely talk in the same tone to all your political opponents while insinuating its their lack of education that is the problem. And, it does correlate. Your political opponents on average are less educated than your political supporters. And so, you using that when clearly misrepresenting the facts surely makes them feel like listening to your arguments and carefully considering them. After all, they come from someone better educated than them, yeah?





  • What do you do in a democracy where say, for the sake of the argument, exactly 50% of your population is racist?

    As in, 50% of your population believes skin color does not matter, the other 50% believe if you’re darker than a certain shade, your brain is that of a baboon, and as an unsuitable human being you should be kept outside of the country borders.

    What do you do?


    Now, you’re in the same situation, but the split is 60/40. Will you use your majority power to exterminate the other 40?


    So far all you do is gather on some corner of the internet and cry in each others shoulder. Every fuckin day. On every fuckin sub.

    This platform was created as some “Fediverse”. Something big and all-encompassing. Flying above individual organizations, nations, languages, etc. But all it is atm is an emotional support corner for the non-racist americans.