• 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 29th, 2025

help-circle





  • Well, this kind of AI won’t ever be useful as a programmer. It doesn’t think. It doesn’t reason. It cannot make decisions besides using a ton of computational power and enormous deep neural networks to shit out a series of words that seem like they should follow your prompt. An LLM is just a really, really good next-word guesser.

    So when you ask it to solve the Tower of Hanoi problem, great it can do that. Because it saw someone else’s answer. But if you ask it to solve it for a tower than is 20 disks high it will fail because no one ever talks about going that far and it flounders. It’s not actually reasoning to solve the problem - it’s regurgitating answers it has ingested from stolen internet conversations. It’s not even attempting to solve the general case because it’s not trying to solve the problem, it’s responding to your prompt.

    That said - an LLM is also great as an interface to allow natural language and code as prompts for other tools. This is where the actually productive advancements will be made. Those tools are garbage today but they’ll certainly improve.












  • <progress> ---- <status_quo> ---- <regression>

    It’s pretty obvious what happens when you vote. Sure, the Democrats really only represent status quo. But by voting for them at least you don’t regress into fucking fascism. It’s been shitty and I really hope Schumer kicks the bucket already so we can get leadership in the only party that even vaguely resembles a functioning representation of a democracy. But the whole “VoTe YoUr IdEaLs” approach just results in… regression. If you want your ideals to be represented then fucking run for office or be rich enough to splash large amounts of money and influence the vote.