I would say it’s rather telling that you just assume someone is going to “do something to you”
Interesting, because that’s exactly what you did.
Downvote haraas and insult me all you want
I would say it’s rather telling that you just assume someone is going to “do something to you”
Interesting, because that’s exactly what you did.
Downvote haraas and insult me all you want
I see, so if I state something as fact even though it isn’t, in the “news” community of all places, that’s not considered rule breaking? But my comment that pointed out that lie is infact rule breaking because I didn’t do it in a friendlier manner. Is that correct?
You never removed the one that is lying about abuse that never happened. You only removed mine where I pointed out there was no evidence. The reason given : “trolling”. So it’s trolling now to stick to the facts?
Which is why you removed my comment. You picked a side by removing my side from being able to speak. Hey they said they personally guarantee abuse is happening. There is no evidence to that from the article or anywhere. You have now erased that and the only conversation now is theirs. You picked a side.
I think you need to go back to reddit.
Or else what? You’ll do something to me? You’ll downvote me?
User: I guarantee abuse is happening
Me: Bullshit, there’s no evidence for that
User: Bootlicker!
User2: Both of you behave
Guess Im a bootlicker who needs to behave. Sorry for having an opinion and keeping to the facts. My bad bro. I won’t ever speak my mind again I’ve learned my lesson
Don’t be upset =)
Uh oh, you just broke Rule 1 That wasn’t very civil of you.
So zero evidence the cops and guards in this case did anything wrong. Thanks for being honest about lying =)
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Trump supporter
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
If you read carefully, you’ll see my comment is a reply to a different user.
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
Easy way to give me a heart attack