Cromite is an alternative

I do have an idea how “a difficult to kill, unwanted growth” could be put into relation to a war fueled by hatred.

source?

Your comment kinda reads like an ad.

In Germany the liberal institutions decide who can and cannot run, and they have decided the commies are out

Back in 1946, it was decided that antidemocratic parties shouldn’t be part of a democracy. Hence antidemocratic parties are illegal.

That’s it. You are very much allowed to abolish private property if you wish to do so. You’ll just have to do it in a democratic manner.

And it just so happens that abolishing private property is very much not a popular idea.

(No, the current German government can not decide who can run in elections.)

You really think such a ban isn’t supported by a large amount of voters? You think it’s purely the “bourgeoisie” that’s transphobic?

All 3 systems use openssl and get attacked using Heartbleed.

(And even if they don’t reuse even a single piece of code, attackers can still just use multiple exploits.)

Every category of carbon emissions is just a part of the total carbon emissions.

That makes sense. I didn’t attempt to decipher what sw meant because it didn’t seem relevant to the story.

feminine enough to survive other ways

Is this supposed to imply prostitution?

claiming the GDPR is good =/= claiming the GDPR is flawless

They didn’t say that either. Where do you get this idea from that they’re talking about (all) US news sites?

They said “American propaganda websites”. That may include some news sites. It may also not include some news sites.

The most you could infer from their statement is that only American propaganda websites violate the GDPR.

Of course websites exist that violate the GDPR and are not American propaganda websites.

But the vast majority of websites commiting severe violations of the GDPR that an average European encounters will be American propaganda websites.

(Believe it or not, Europeans don’t often visit websites written in Russian or Chinese.)

I especially find the community name useful in links.

32500000000 KW/h per year

That's 32500000000 kWh/y
= 32500000000 * k * W * h / y
= 32500000000 * k * W * h / (365 * 24 * h)
= 32500000000 * k * W * h / 8760 / h
= 32500000000 / 8760 * k * W * h / h
= 3710046 * k * W * 1
= 3710046 kW

(You actually corrected yourself later when converting to mW.)

But KW/h/y is dumb so lets just make it KW/h

It’s kW, not KW/h.

I do not believe the majority of people don’t know about the effects of climate change. I believe that the majority of people voting against climate friendly policies simply choose to not think long term.

Someone who votes to continue the status quo is to be blamed for the status quo.

You can limit capitalism without abolishing it.

In Germany people are guaranteed 20/24 paid vacation days. That’s not profitable.

That’s a limit imposed on capitalism. It can be done and has been done without abolishing capitalism.

That’s just one of the thousands of policies that limit capitalism.

You can limit capitalism (as literally every capitalist nation does) without abolishing it.

Enforcing climate friendlyness would be just another limit.

Your first link is US only, your second link is about a completely seperate issue. You don’t need to dismantle capitalism to protect the climate.

In Germany, where I live, the voters could easily vote for the greens “Grüne” and the left “Linke”.

If those two parties had a majority in government, we’d have a climate friendly system in no time.

But they don’t. We had a conservative government for 16 years. Now we have a center government, which sadly includes the small government / free market party “FDP”, blocking all significant progress.

No systemic oppression stops people from voting Left/Greens. But they never did, and never will.

There’s now an uprise of the far right party “AfD” in Germany, to the point it’s becoming one of the major parties.

In Germany people have the choice readily available to stop actively damaging the climate.

But every couple of years, they freely choose to not do that.

I feel like many left-wing people regularly forget about the billions of people who genuinely do not care to do anything about climate change.

These people aren’t “you”.

I could make a similar statement:

Child? You’re literally being abused and raped by your parents on a regular basis.

This statement is true for a lot more children than the prior statement is for black people.

It’s still a stupid statement.

No, being a child doesn’t mean you’ll be abused and being black doesn’t mean you’ll be attacked.

Luckily many people live in democracies where they can simply vote to enact climate policies.

Sadly most people living in those democracies choose to continue enabling climate change.

The reason nothing is being done against climate change isn’t corrupt politicians. It’s the millions of people voting for them.