Maki

Right, because UEFI is open sourced and can be checked by anyone. Oh, wait, no, that’s why Libreboot is a thing: https://libreboot.org/ I will agree that TrustedComputingGroup and the way they use TPM have a more open standard, but I still don’t trust some of the companies behind it. Especially Microsoft, who have completely lost the plot with recent Windows versions. There is definitely a reason to be wary of it, as cryptographer Ross Anderson is quoted here on wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_Computing#Criticism Software Piracy is a direct answer to greedy publishers who burn out developers and force them to make crapware which they then force DRM on so people can’t play it even if they own the original release. Better people than me have written about how awful DRM is in games. See https://www.gog.com/blog/what-exactly-is-drm-in-video-games-and-why-should-you-care/ or https://expertbeacon.com/why-is-drm-bad-for-gaming/ for exaples. DRM is bad for game preservation purposes or simply to allow someone to install and reinstall the game they own several times. Better people than me have written out about the various issues which DRM caused in the past, most notably safedisc and securom which were well-reported upon. It does not belong in gaming. I can explain a lot, and can attribute a lot to stupidity and greed on either side of the argument. It’s not FUD when it’s a slow crawl to further enshittification and overzealous identification and exclusion of individual users and systems while giving false reasons for why we should put up with it.

Ask yourself why TrustedComputing became a thing, why UEFI and TPM are required for newer Windows versions and what they actually do. And each new step they add something more restrictive to prevent your system running unidentified code. Ask why kernel-level DRM is employed as an anticheat measure. What other kernel-level DRM is on your system? Do you know? Do you care enough to stop using the products pushing it onto your system in the first place? We’re slowly but surely letting the dystopian futures we were warned about happen by not protesting every single time they lock some part of your life down “for reasons”.

Considering the technology available in the Marvel universe she’s from, there might be a subdermal implant regulating that for her.

You are aware they’re fictional characters, I hope?

I’d say it’s the most stable, but not necessarily the most lightweight, no. It certainly can be if you know what you’re doing; get a netinst image and build it up from TTY and you can make it as slimline as you want. KDE is a pretty intensive suite of programs, offering almost a complete 1-to-1 replacement of Windows, so it is definitely not lightweight, but it’s probaby the easiest to learn how to use Linux on, especially with Discover being an organised software store to find programs in. If you want lightweight and don’t mind getting frustrated because you don’t know Linux basics, don’t go for KDE but try something like LXDE instead. Looks like older Windows and generally functions fine, but doesn’t have Discover. You could still install it via something like Synaptic though. I believe most distros, including Debian, should have it available. You need to separate the user environment from the distro in your mind; Arch, Debian, Fedora, or other distros are just a collection of available packages which are installable and updatable via their respective package managers. Gnome, KDE, LXDE, XFCE, and other desktop environments are not bound by what distro they run on and are what you work with in the foreground. You can distrohop and use the same graphical frontend on another distro and it will work the same.

I’d say for a new user it doesn’t really matter which distro you use as long as you find an environment you’re comfortable using to get your feet wet. I would highly recommend going for KDE if you come from Windows since it has a similar appearance. Gnome for those coming from Apple. With regards to your question; if you want stability, go for Debian as a distro. Especially on an older laptop like that it will work fine. You could grab the ISO via the official site here (Click on the “Live KDE” link) : https://www.debian.org/CD/live/ If you do happen to go for KDE, use the Discover program to find new software to install. If you would like to have flatpak, or snap support this can also be installed via Discover. If I remember correctly there’s also an appimage manager you could find via Discover, which will “install” all appimages to a specific folder so you can more easily find them there. Beyond the above it should be easy enough to get wise about Linux by using it. Even without installing you can use the liveimage for a while to get a feel for it, and I would definitely suggest looking around for what suits your tastes. Experiment to your heart’s content; if you break something you can just reinstall it from a new live image.

As someone who used Linux on both team green and red cards since 2005 or so, can confirm. Nvidia is more troublesome to get working and will suddenly decide your card won’t work the way it worked for years before just because their driver has had a version change. AMD runs fine on open source drivers; Mesa mostly has out of the box support without too much hassle.