Yeah, can we not?
Yeah, can we not?
Denver International Airport you say…? I think this eagle was onto something before they had to remove it. He got too close to the truth.
The fact that Israel is evil doesn’t make Jews everywhere evil. That needs to be said.
I know it needs to be said (because if you don’t, the conversation will get derailed), but does it really need to be said? I feel like this rule only applies in this situation.
When else does this need to be said in order to not be considered a racist or terrorist?
It should be self-evident, and it’s fucking frustrating that decades of equating criticism of Israel with antisemitism has worked this well.
deleted by creator
Sietches…
I guess this was just one level of abstraction too much for you huh?
The entire issue here is AI being trained on people’s data without them knowing or giving permission. The question of who’s likenesses and which photos are being used is an excellent question and it’s a big part of the problem here.
Excellent question.
Even fucking Yemenis can take the time out to march in support of Gaza… What the fuck is our excuse?
Their photos are still unwittingly being used as training data.
I thought this was a D&D alignment chart at first… And yes, Inkjet printers are chaotic evil.
And those sentences would be enforced by whom exactly?
Similarly, they could try Putin in absentia and sentence him to all manner of things, but in reality what do you think actually happens to him? Right, nothing.
What do people think the ICC is going to do? Any teeth it may have had in 1949 have long been removed, especially given the US’ essential ambivalence toward its existence.
Am I being tasked with creating a protocol for evaluating which symbols the government should display? Like what do you think you’re accomplishing with this line of questioning? It’s not my fucking job or expertise to come up with that criteria, there are much smarter people who could do that.
I know you think you’ve made some powerful rebuttal here, but you really haven’t.
There is no set of reasonable, ethical criteria that could possibly make displaying a rainbow flag offensive. It just doesn’t exist. If you’re upset by seeing a pride flag, then that’s 100% your problem.
That’s like getting mad at seeing the California flag flying next to the US flag because you just hate that CA exists. Fucking dumb.
Perhaps each symbol could be evaluated individually based on what it is meant to represent? I don’t know why that’s such a difficult thing to imagine.
I’ve seen those black “POW/MIA” flags next to US flags all of the time and I’ve never once seen a single ammosexual conservative freak complain about it, despite their cult of personality centering around someone who literally belittled prisoners of war for being caught.
I’ve never heard of anyone complaining about that. I see the “pride” flag to be as offensive as the black POW/MIA flag.
Yeah my agenda of (checks notes) thinking people shouldn’t be persecuted for existing.
A dire slippery slope for sure.
Another two steps back.
Starving four year olds? Come on man, they’re not monsters.
Yeah… People put all of the blame on Reagan, and yes he is mostly to blame, but I believe JFK was the one who started shutting down government-run asylums. And yeah, at the time it may have been the humane thing to do given what kind of shit went on in those places (and specifically, what happened to his sister Rosemary).
Unfortunately, they were never replaced with anything better.
(FYI, I’m not a conservative trying to make Democrats look bad. Check my comment history if you don’t believe me)
Yup. The cries of “identity politics” from the right was just more projection. Because of course it was.
You can get a used PS4 for pretty damn cheap these days, and Bloodborne is basically free… I would say it’s worth the investment, the game is phenomenal.