What was the book?
I’d be curious to read about the experiment in particular
What was the book?
I’d be curious to read about the experiment in particular
If you have some sort of decent antivirus/antimalware like Malwarebytes, that would work for standalone applications to an extent.
Browser extensions are a lot harder to check.
Always make sure you get the RIGHT extension from the PROPER SOURCE. Same with most downloads and app store stuff on your mobile devices, but at least with executables, you can additionally run virus scans for some peace of mind.
Some tips…
I believe you can generally trust what permissions an extension or app needs (since the browser/device knows which permission an extension/app uses, and locks them away otherwise), but be wary of the implications of some of them (such as data from other websites, or accessibility features).
That’s also freakin’ bizarre to me! Lol
Lmao. That’s freakin’ bizarre.
One generally pays the cost of living whether they’re meeting new people or not.
Open carrying an ak47 in walmart in a suburb is weird
Is this an exaggeration for effect, or something that’s actually legal in some places?
City people might be at greater risk, being more likely to start filming if they see a bear. Or trying to get a selfie with it.
Less likely to do that with a mugger! Lol
You’re a real beacon of positivity, huh? And you clearly didn’t read their post.
Mathematically yes, but in the real world, it’s probably not much safer.
Imagine that you’ve got an unpickable lock on the front door to your house. You’re asking about putting another door with another unpickable lock in front of it.
Great, sure, but we’re talking about a world where most people get in not through picking the lock, but by someone leaving the backdoor open, or hiding keys under the doormat.
Disclaimer: I’m not making any claims about household break-and-enters. It’s just an analogy.
but I think being a male virgin after a certain age is enormously more vilified these days than it was in, for instance, the 50s, even among more progressive, left leaning groups.
Not sure if this is true, but I’m pretty sure that research says that people were having more sex back then. So probably fewer virgins back then.
There was less to do for entertainment in the 50s, lol
Basically in the same as you, but Steam is cheaper in my country, and I have a larger library of modern games there thanks to Humble Bundle and friends gifting me games there
At least it was a stupid mistake rather than poor study design.
And one that kind of makes sense how it’d happen, too.
“We don’t have any more data on these couples after a few sessions. What does that mean?”
“Oh, well we don’t follow up with divorced couples, so we wouldn’t have more data after the divorce date. Tag them as divorced.”
Disclaimer: Hypothetical scenario I’ve imagined to explain the error. Not based in reality.
Yeah, saying “I left because I didn’t like it” makes prospective employers wonder what will stop you from leaving your new position when its downsides reach you. It sounds like you’ll just bounce around until you find the job you hate the least.
If it’s framed as “I want to leave because this job has things that I want”, then there’s no reason to believe that something new will push you out.
… though I do find myself wondering why OP believes it’s unrealistic to value a well-maintained database… especially in Germany, given the stereotypes! Lol
Donald Trump had a wife whose age was a single digit?
New conspiracy theory: The reason the US has only incredibly old presidential candidates is because the VPs are pulling all the strings.
From the title, it sounds like something that any keyboard shortcut enthusiast would be able to extrapolate to their own shortcuts. But if yours are custom, then it’s more like a fun fact about yourself.
That seems pretty misleading…
Many users here, for example, have described the lens through which we should view MBFC.
You’re assuming the people behind MBFC are operating on an objective scale
No, I’m not. I’m saying “If we know that they’re flawed, we can take their flaws into consideration. But if we have to look at each source independently, we need to do a new investigation for each new source”.
Just because you added a question mark doesn’t mean it fits this sub. I think this post isn’t at all in line with what the sub is about.