my dad uses this LLM python code generation quite routinely, he says the output’s mostly fine.
my dad uses this LLM python code generation quite routinely, he says the output’s mostly fine.
… and I came to believe that our current cosmology is incomplete or wrong.
Well, yes, I agree with you.
I don’t like saying it because people get very emotional and unreasonable about this but:
These things were normal a long time ago. It’s only been in recent years, especially starting from the 1960s, that moral panic took over and these things are looked at now as “a crime”.
Ok maybe my numbers were a little bit off but the point is: if the universe were created slowly, we’d see clear traces of that. but the evidence points into the opposite direction, that the universe, at some point, was very hot and dense, before stars started forming. So the question is, where would all that matter come from? I deem it’s unlikely to all just be “one huge quantum fluctuation”, but i’m not sure about that; cosmology is exotic sometimes.
Our theoretical framework, allowing matter creation (*) provides a possible origin for the universe (without the need of a Big Bang).
If you look at the typical composition of a star today, you will find that it is mostly (99%) hydrogen.
We know that a star burns hydrogen into helium, and therefore the relative fraction of hydrogen in the star’s composition decreases annually by a specific rate (let’s say 0.0000001%). That means that a star might have an average lifetime of 1 billion years, before its composition changes and it has only small fraction of hydrogen left.
If the universe were created slowly (by a slow process, such as spontaneous particle creation would be), then stars would burn out while they are being created; In other words, we wouldn’t see stars that are mostly unconsumed hydrogen, but instead, stars that are mostly already consumed helium, with slow rates of hydrogen being created continuously.
But that would lead to stars having a drastically different composition: instead of 99% hydrogen and 1% helium, we might see 1% hydrogen and 99% helium. That is why I believe a “slow creation” of the universe to be unlikely.
“shit” expresses excitement. And just like excitement, that can be good or bad.
Good code is self-explanatory. You should only comment your code if it does something unexpectedly complicated.
That being said, it’s always a good idea to write a manual, about how to use the code. Don’t document how it works, because those who can code will understand it anyways, and those who can’t, have no need to understand it.
My dad’s re-learning Python coding for work rn, and AI saves him a couple of times; Because he’d have no idea how to even start but AI points him in the right direction, mentioning the correct functions to use and all. He can then look up the details in the documentation.
Well, it lays on tables a lot, with the backside facing up.
The same could be asked with smartphones.
Why don’t smartphones include solar panels on the back side of the phone?
I personally prefer dialogs.FileDialog.open()
FileDialogFactory
This sounds like the typical plot of a story from The Codeless Code.
Edit: How about this story specifically?
I would not consider integration to be basic maths, honestly. Basic maths is addition and multiplication, and maybe vector geometry.
For real what is it with them, where are they even trying to go with this?
Edit: I mean the Israel army. What is their end goal?
Depression has many causes: