deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

That’s normal that he blocks useful things.

Without him, EU would already live in 2033…

There is not 2 state solution with Netanyahu and there is no 2 state solution with Hamas. Both need to lose power first.

You don’t believe in this thing expects have studied?

You believe, there will be peace with a terror organization that wants to destroy Israel?

There is probably no expert who says that there is a 100% guarantee that there must be a new Hamas after the current Hamas, just because Israel destroys it. That’s in your head. It’s not a fact, not a quote from any expert.

not a lady with snakes for hair

Jesus Christ, that’s Medusa, not Hydra…

I am now completely convinced you don’t understand what the Hydra effect is at all.

No, of course not!!!1111 It’s very difficult to understand the word!!!111 Totally impossible to apply the “you slice 1 head off and 2 new ones appear” on the Hamas conflict to get “for every fighter you kill, two new ones will emerge”… Only you are able to do this /s

The Hydra effect basically means that for every fighter you kill, two new ones will emerge.

Good job. And now, you need to understand this: I don’t believe, that your theory “WE WILL FOR SURE EXPERIENCE THE HYDRA EFFECT” necessarily applies here!!

Do you understand that??

You act like it’s a fact that it’s 100% impossible that Israel could get rid of Hamas and that a new Gaza government and a new Israel government can find a persistent solution. It’s not.

You can not negotiate a persistent peace with an organization that has the main goal to destroy Israel. Their main goal is not a separate state. Their main goal is to destroy Israel!! Please tell me how you’d negotiate with them…

Hamas is a pain in the *** for Israel, but also for the civilians in Gaza. If Hamas stays, there won’t be peace and we make sure that even more generations of people die there.

Come on… You compared Hamas with a hydra, not me. All my previous comments are pretty much signalizing that the hydra comparison is bad, because there is a chance to beat Hamas and solve the problem.

Just because you make that comparison does not make it a fact that trying to get rid of Hamas results in a new extremist organization.

Either we talk about the conflict between Hamas and Israel or about Greek mythology… 😉

I understand what you meant.

Them taking this approach is guaranteed to create the next extremist group within a few years

I’d disagree that is guaranteed.

• Trying to get rid of Hamas => There is a chance to resolve this forever. Maybe, this will fail. Maybe, it won’t.
• Not doing anything => There is an extremist group (Hamas) and they will attack again, because their main goal is to destroy Israel. That’s what they say.

sad

So it has no plans to avoid the Hydra effect.

We better hope, they have. And I don’t think, their strategy is based on “Let’s destroy and decide afterwards”. The Israel opposition is also involved in the decision.

2.3 million people will not starve to death

The 2.3 million is obviously exaggerated. That’s the total population, but I accept that argument. Cease-fire can reduce “starving to death”, but it’s clear, that temporary “peace” is not permanent peace.

IMO, Netanyahu has a time window for external support. The longer this takes, the less the support. And that’s why they are pushing this operation.

I hope, this ends with a Hamas out of power, followed by the Israel opposition getting rid of Netanyahu, who is very unpopular since the attack on Israel. With a new government in Gaza and a new one in Israel, maybe, this gives them the opportunity to solve this conflict.

That’s a question for the “war cabinet” of Israel.

Even with only 1 head, the “Hydra” caused horrendous damages and will do it again.

IMO, cease-fire with Hamas is like cease-fire with Putin or cease-fire with Hitler. It’s just a time to prepare for the next stage of the conflict. Again and again and again and again. But as long as the people in power stay the same, it won’t end.

Look at the Wikipedia article of Hamas and search for “cease-fire”… That’s not a new concept in this conflict.

With Hamas (Their primary goal is to destroy Israel) at power, this conflict will NEVER end.

The only chance to end it is with a Gaza that is not controlled by a terroristic organization with the primary goal to destroy Israel.

I think, at this point, there is no way back.

If Israel manages to get rid of Hamas, there is a chance to end this and prevent more death and pain in the future. If Israel stops right now and Hamas keeps the power, it will backfire for sure.

Yeah? You, a random person on the internet, are sure that just this simple step solves the 80 years existing conflict?

I am in favor of 2 states and in favor of minimizing death and pain in Gaza and in favor of giving people in Gaza a perspective, but that does not make the terroristic Hamas dictatorship disappear.

Gaza needs to get rid of Hamas and Israel needs to get rid of Netanyahu.

You wrote “foreign agent” and “bought”.

That’s what requires proof… And one of the articles mentions that the “bought” part is just an accusation.

Oh, wow… The evidence you put in your comment is amazing!!!11

I hope, this conflict ends at some point.

But for it to end forever, Hamas needs to disappear. Their main goal is to destroy Israel.

Otherwise, it’s just waiting for the next terroristic attack.

It’s a shame that both sides haven’t used the previous years to solve the problem.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator