DAMN BOI HE THICK

Nice!

We have unixsurrealism! Fox news (news for foxes), Bun alert system and cool stuff about retro hardware. Any politics involved are often behind rhetoric and never seen as spam.

I was asking the same Hahahha.

Literally me every time I want to program something slightly complex in Python.

That sounds hella painful

He is making the job worse for his team not his corporation. That’s not the way to deal with that.

I hate this kind of practice. It shows no empathy for the guy that will have to fix it.

Yeah, games are the only thing that it’s keeping me outside fully FOSS. It’s getting better though.

So they were developing the game by sharing zips of their versions? OMG. There should be a tutorial of minimum Dev knowledge for wanna be new developers. They have very cool ideas, but the way they program…

For example Shadows of Doubt. Was running super bad last time I checked out. I think that too much accessibility to game Dev tools is lowering the quality of a lot of games (in resource hungry sense).

The closest thing I know as a kind of FOSS project (totally not FOSS) is Road to Vostok. It’s still in development, programmed in Godot.

Oh wait!! You may like S.T.A.L.K.E.R. GAMMA. I think all the source code has FOSS kind of licences. The game is free as in beer too. Prettt good actually. Single player inmersive tactical postapocaliptic shooter. With good grahpics too.

Non FOSS tactical games that you may like:

• Swat 4, if you mod it with SEF and use voice commands it gets pretty good.

• Arma 3. You have plenty of mods to make it as realistic as you want. Ace, etc.

• Arma Reforger.

• Ready or Not. Combined with voice attack it’s amazing.

For multiplayer games that aren’t that tactical but still more tactical than FPS games. But that are super fun:

• Rising Storm Vietnam. SUPER SUPER FUN GAME. Coordinated team play is not that important.

• Squad: SUPER SUPER FUN. More realistic than RSV. It has vehicles. Very important to have a good coordinated gameplay in order to be enjoyable.

• Insurgency (Saga): Kind of tactical CSGO (simplified explanation). Cool concept cool gameplay. But the comunity has shifted (in the Insurgency Sandstorm) from tactical gameplay to fps/cod/csgo like. Full rushing and stuff. Skins and that kind of stuff that kills a game. I don’t play it anymore.

Upcoming tactical shooters:

• Stalker 2.
• 83’.
• Arma 4.

Others i haven’t played:

DayZ.

Games that are good but that i don’t recommend at all because of its devs:

Escape From Tarkov.

He seeks vengeance

So the myth about most of the Navy are weebs is true. That or maybe most of the population are weebs.

Wearing weeb stuff in your school backpack okay, but do you really have to wear that patch in the military…

Hey but cool moustache!

What’s wrong with having a some year old software? Does it do what you need? Yes. Then what? I have all I need on Debian. Why should I care of new updates. Security? Yes we have Debian security because of that. Look, y’all had the xyz backdoor package in your systems because it was new. Me as a Debian stable user I didn’t have to deal with it. Did I lose something by not having the latests software? No. Well maybe less crashes.

Most privative software also gets weekly updates. Does it make it better? No. You may prefer that.

Also I don’t get the point about the version numbering of Debian packages. Every team uses the versioning they want.

From my experience software that updates a lot tends to break old features a lot too.

Debian suporting freesoftware projects or other stuff doesn’t look as a relevant argument. I mean if you prefer using privative stuff and using that kind of software. Do whatever you like with your Google/Facebook/Apple friends.

But don’t come intoxicate the community with this bullshit.

You can always adapt to your how repo. But yeah, that’s the point. If you can trust people to make changes on a repo then you should be able to trust them in using some kind of commit structure.

Generic names are probably used in order to crate a familiar, easy to remember, structurized commit format.

You can always water it down. The point is to have some order in the commits. Otherwise is just messy.

Please use Conventional Commits. Simple and easy to use. Plus it is very easy so combine with Versioning techniques like Semantic Versioning.

We don’t fucking care about your new boss Mozilla

Hello shoe of wisdom, what do you think of the dog of wisdom?

Nice, my lovely C syntax. Thank you!