• 0 Posts
  • 33 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 4th, 2023
  • golden_zealot@lemmy.mltoGaming@lemmy.ml•Sony Live Service Shooter Concord Debuts to a Tragic 697 Concurrent Players on Steam - IGNEnglish
    16·
    24 days ago

    The character roster for this game looks so generic and boring.

    https://dotesports.com/concord/news/all-concord-characters-every-freerunner-weapon-ability-and-crew-bonus

    You have the choice of:

    -Cylindrical yellow robot (arguably this is the most original and interesting design)

    -Woman with puffy sleeves

    -Woman with box on head

    -Man with goggles and winter jacket

    -Old Woman

    -Woman with pauldrons

    -Generic Woman

    -Green woman with ears

    -Man with hat

    -Pink robot

    -Mushroom

    -Green man with shit on arms

    -Woman with sphere on head

    -Blue and Red man

    -Generic Man

    -Generic Woman 2

    Like, I’ve hardly played overwatch but at least I can tell from afar what most of the characters do from looking at them. Clearly, in overwatch, Giant knight with hammer is a melee tank, clearly the ninja guy with the sword is mobile and and has some melee ability, clearly the lady with the sniper rifle is a sniper, clearly the angel is a healer, clearly, the lady with the jetpack can fly and is support, etc.

    Applying this logic to concord, the BEST I can guess is that Woman with pauldrons is a tank, otherwise the design is so ass, I really can’t even tell.

    Get a design department and/or let them do their job Sony.

  • golden_zealot@lemmy.mltoFirefox@lemmy.ml•Here’s what we’re working on in FirefoxEnglish
    11·
    4 months ago

    So the debate is about what words mean, but when asked to examine what any dictionary defines those words as to understand and agree upon their meanings, you fold immediately?

    If the debate was about this, and I offered this to you, then if we follow your anecdote, it was actually me who lead you to the pacific ocean but then you decided to sit on the beach instead of swimming.

    I guess you don’t believe your argument is predicated on facts in that case since you dropped it the moment you were faced with scrutinizing it against a reputable source.

    Goodbye.

  • golden_zealot@lemmy.mltoFirefox@lemmy.ml•Here’s what we’re working on in FirefoxEnglish
    11·
    4 months ago

    Please go ahead and explain what the difference is between calling a person stupid and calling a persons ideas stupid, given stupidity refers to a persons intelligence by definition.

    If you call someone’s idea stupid, then by definition, you are calling them stupid by extension because that’s what that word means.

    If used in a colloquial manner I can understand how referring to someone’s socks, or a device, or some inanimate object can allow one to call those things “stupid”, but the fact of the matter is that referring to ones ideas as stupid is redundant to calling the person stupid directly because they both refer to the intelligence and original thoughts of a person and therefore literally mean the same thing by definition.

    Furthermore, the notion that saying for example “Your shirt is stupid” or “Your idea is stupid” or “your feelings are stupid” instead of “You are stupid” is not ad hominem due to the colloquial usage is laughable as a fallacious argument only needs to attack the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person rather than attacking the substance of the argument to be considered ad hominem, and if a persons ideas are not considered an attribute of them, I don’t know what is.

    I think I’m pretty brushed up on how this works, but perhaps you should take your own advice, thanks.

  • golden_zealot@lemmy.mltoFirefox@lemmy.ml•Here’s what we’re working on in FirefoxEnglish
    1·
    4 months ago

    No, actually if you read my comment my idea is that they can use an AI release of the browser, while people who don’t want AI in their browser can use a different release without it.

    In response to “So your idea is that visually impaired people should just cry about not having alt text on a lot of images?”.

    This is a loaded question. You shaped the question to be this way so that it would contain presumption of my being guilty of not caring for the differently abled when I have never done such a thing.

    My comment just suggests that options are good for consumers, in this case the option of being able to choose if you want AI in your software.

    If you have a real argument against that idea that is not predicated on presumptive guilt regarding a topic different to what I was talking about like in your first response, feel free to let me know what it is.

    To clarify for you, my saying “Users should have a choice of whether AI is in their browser” being met with your “Then you must hate blind people and want them to cry” does not follow and does not constitute an argument to the contrary.

  • golden_zealot@lemmy.mltoFirefox@lemmy.ml•Here’s what we’re working on in FirefoxEnglish
    310·
    4 months ago

    Any browser which only offers an AI inclusive release, I won’t use.

    If any company that produces browsers really, truly, cared about their customer base, they would offer an AI release and a non-AI release.

    Edit: It’s unfortunate to see that we have reached a stage as consumers that even daring to suggest an option be provided results in such responses. Good luck to all of you when you decide you want an option when a business does something you don’t like with a product because clearly you’ll have no one interested in listening to you.