Take this article with a grain of salt.

1. the site that hosts it is a garbage clickbait health site.
2. It links to an article in the NIH database, but it’s from last year and as the bright yellow box says, there are some concerns about the article. ( concern and the reply )
3. It has been corrected
4. They also note in the article “all oral contraceptive pills may cause mood changes, but the newer oral contraceptive pills containing estradiol or estradiol valerate may be less likely to cause mood changes.”

It’s funny to watch his facade occasionally fall and the curtain to be peeled back, and yet the show just keeps going.

Unlike other politicians, the trail of grifts with him is long, and yet people still keep him going.

Some highlights if you don’t want to click:

Temperatures are forecast to be warmer than normal for all of the northern U.S., from northern California, Oregon and Washington to Pennsylvania, New York and into New England.

NOAA says that temperatures will stay closer to the 30-year average for the South.

For the precipitation (rain, snow, sleet, etc.), the northern states could see below-normal snowfall, especially in the northern Rockies and the Great Lakes.

Across most of the South, wetter than normal conditions are expected, especially in the Southeast from Louisiana to Florida and into the Carolinas.

For the Northeast, there is a chance that this will be a wetter than normal winter from Washington, D.C., to Philadelphia, to New York City and into southern New England.

super important detail

One other thing to note, this is all a probability forecast. The atmosphere is very fluid and dynamic, and forecasts could change.

Boss clearly isn’t online much to see their content.

I’ve worked with Gen-Zers and have never seen this specific issue. Sounds like another example of a boss so removed from workers that their “insights” aren’t based on experiences, but rather on that deadly combo of the tendency of older generations to negatively see generational changes, and that corporate group think where they try to justify not paying their workers their value.

It also sounds like a touch of the corporate group think where they forgot how much their employers had to teach them on the job, and how much they don’t want to continue doing that.

Ahh, Google’s tried and true method of throwing a million half-baked features to people before promptly cancelling them all. This will definitely work for them.

I feel so much safer knowing he might show up and protect me from a grocery store robbery.

Supposedly it’ll be free, they just have to work out their shit?

Same. Paid off loans, and mine dropped because I don’t have any loans.

Yeah the article i posted the other day also suggest solar flares for the increase, but many people chimed in suggesting that this was normal and expected because they have short lifespans. Over 200 in 3 months sounds like a lot to me, which is roughly 4% of their total satellites and the earliest production satellites were from 2019 and it wasn’t even 200.

Too many college graduates are leaving Mississippi, and aligning degree programs with labor market demand might stem the tide, White said.

It doesn’t even take a full brain cell to figure this one out. Tying budgets to the job market in mississippi isn’t going to help if they aren’t creating reasonable jobs there.

TikTok
YouTube

Here’s the psyarxiv link - It’s short and worth reading.

It sounds like some of the general issue here is around the language of being “dominant” and “well-established” and that it might be receiving undue attention without more thorough research supporting it. There’s also some concern about the testability of some of the claims the theory proposes.

Part of the letter’s issue seems to be about sharing results prior to peer-review.

The actual letter doesn’t seem to claim it should be labeled pseudoscience, but just mentions that some others have labeled it that:

“IIT is an ambitious theory, but some scientists have labeled it as pseudoscience”

(edit: language clarifications)

Not research, but cool.

I’m not hell-bent on people pushing back against folks arguing against it – I LOVE that, and I love that you want to do that. I’m against people doing it in ways that boost their voices and what they’re saying and giving them more platform to do it. I gave you a few options. You can also dig up news articles about this issue and post them.

But you do you.

My point isn’t to not argue for the existence of human beings, just be selective about who you argue with and how that draws attention to them. You can do that without replying to them to bring them back. Just reference their name without @ing them. You can share this info without that.

“don’t feed the trolls” not enlightened centerist nonsense, and there aren’t good-faith moderators on lemmy.world. This has been around for 30+ years at this point, and people do it because it works, and it’s been researched. Removing or diminishing their voice is the only thing that helps, regardless of how its done, and there’s research on this plus tons of experience of people modding communities.

They also have fun with it. Their goal is to waste your time. So even if you have fun with it, you’re still boosting the behavior so they can go back to their corners and share it with others, who then also come back.

There’s a reason so many spaces just rely on banning. Your time is better spent sharing reasonable articles for the people who actually are semi-coherent, and you’re going to have more effect doing that.

it’s better to just write new comments and downvote such that theirs get burried.

Engaging them just makes longer threads that draw attention to their comments. Everytime you reply, he comes back and adds more comments.

Don’t bother. The dude is a troll.

Chrome lost its way years ago. I value not seeing ads or getting personalized content more than I value 99% of the chrome features.

Since Firefox finally fixed that weird memory fragmentation issue, it’s been pretty smooth sailing for me. Inspector & Debugger could use a few performance patches though.

straws … grasping …

Sure, but you shared the clarification the journalist used, so they’ve actually spelled out that it’s not just school massacres in the article. It also doesn’t necessarily imply the core title isn’t true.

The more you read, the more you start to realize there are never clear definitions for anything. You always have to look for the author to clearly define what they’re talking about.