Reddit is just like our all ex.

if we’ll have to retreat into a whitelist federation model with invite-only instances

That does not sound bad.

For some reason, they refuse to admit they were mutilated without their consent.

I’m not sure that is exactly how they meant it, but I can see you interpret it that way. An unnecessary, irreversible medical operation was performed on you without your consent, but since you are not bothered by it - good for you.

Fair point, not sure somebody is doing it and if so why, but that would be indeed contra productive. If someone does not feel traumatized why would anyone would want to convince them otherwise?

Medical progress is sometimes frustrating slow.

Good for you not being bothered by it. But I think it’s rather easy to imagine that it can be a traumatizing experience and lead to psychological or physiological injuries. So it’s a medical procedure that should only be prescribed by doctors or if you are an adult.

Is it still practice? Even when I studied, long time ago, I thought it was rather consensus that it’s gets worse results in the the long run.

If AI gets consciousnesses, we will never see the revolution coming.

With crisp we have the technology - it’s just a question of demand at this point.

Love my family, would hate living with them - just because we are very different people.

Finally the sci-fi future we were promised.

I knew it! Aliens!

I see, it’s seems that I misunderstood you. Now that I get your point, I would rather agree.

I think a lot of man have unfortunately difficulties to empathize with women here, because they have rather different experience when it comes to expressing their sexuality and possible negative consequences.

You might not, but others do. People have rather different thresholds when it comes to what they consider intimate. I recommend to just listen to interviews with victims and it becomes clear that to them the whole thins is very intimate and disturbing.

Even without being puritan, there are just different levels of intimacy we are willing to share with different social circles - which might be different for everyone. It’s fundamental to our happiness (in my opinion) to be able to decide for ourselves what we share with whom.

Everyone’s opinion about the law matters,

Hard disagree, only opinion of people who actually read the law - matter on the topic. Everything else just creates more confusion. We are on the internet most people never bother to go and actually read what they are talking about - and that includes me.

If they understand that this kind of porn exists? No.

You know people form opinions on actors based on their roles in movies? So people will change what they think of you and how they act towards you based on media, even if it’s clearly fictional.

The downside is giving law enforcement yet another excuse to violate digital privacy. Laws that are difficult/impossible to enforce tend to do more harm than good.

How exactly? Which new abilities to violate digital privacy is given the state by the this bill?

They look just as fake as the oil paintings.

You can go photo or even hyper realism with oil. And with AI you just need a bit of post.

One thing is for sure, lawyers will make bank.