azuth

Most fruits are low calorie with a lot of them having less than 100 kcal per 100g. There are some exceptions such as Avocado (due to fat content actually) and dates as well dried fruit (prunes at 300/100g vs plums at 45/100g).

Strawberries, cherries, apples, figs, bananas all are below 100kcal/100g. Obviously some are better at filing you up than others.

Much more diverse opinions mainly because there are more non-Americans percentage wise.

Rotting Christ and hear the Christians squeal.

So because spammers exist you created an eveng greater spammer?

What does “third opinion” mean? That its supposedly “neutral” or “unbiased”?

Why does FUTO have to shoot itself in the foot?

There is as far as I can tell no new actual license just a payment scheme and some shaming functionality. They even offer you the software if you don’t pay. Remember the GPL allows them to require payment to give you the software, they just can’t prohibit someone else giving you the software.

However calling unpaid copies unlicensed is incorrect, they are licensed under the GPL (just like paid ones are).

They should remove references to licensing and display something like “This instance of Immich has been paid/not been paid for.” Call the key PRODUCT key.

Sure some find the “pay or shame” scheme distasteful but it is not against the GPL which allows commercial use.

The addons on the store are signed and you can install them from an xpi file in regular Firefox.

Try it.

That’s completely inaccurate. They are rioting so that immigrants from mainland France will not be allowed to vote.

Fixing a bug for a fee will create a liability and obligations for the developer. Should you mess it up, Microsoft will have no issue burying you to save even just face.

I can see him getting into a long term relationship that could guarantee the projects survival long-term,(and you at least invest some money for a lawyer to tell you what your are signing on for). For something that would get a few months for the project not so much.

Regulations are not "maybe"s.

You don’t and that’s a feature for Apple.

What incident? Israel is not going to pull any shenanigans on France.

De facto truth is that French air force conducted air drops of supplies in uncontestedly Israeli airspace above Gaza.

Israel is not going to attack French military aircraft, it will be political suicide.

I also do not understand your fixation on commercial overflight which is irrelevant here.

That’s like your opinion dude. In actual law national airspace (the only airspace a nation can actually own) extents over territory (whether land or territorial waters).

So in reality recognizing airspace over Gaza as being Israel’s recognizes Gaza as Israeli territory.

With a British husband and a baby girl with dual nationality

Has the UK already repealed the EU’s citizens’ (obviously here it would be the British citizen’s right, the husband’s) to live with their family, aka residency cards for spouses of citizens?

The genocide of Palestinians by Israel has been going on way longer than Hamas has existed.

I am no armchair legal scholar, I 've already argued against placing too much value on legality. It is you on the other hand who tries to minimize the severity of Israel’s wrongdoings by arguing pseudo-legalistic semantics.

If the 1948 convention never existed, Israel’s actions would be just as reprehensible.

Definition Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

Article II

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

in whole or in part. Not that you care, just for anybody wondering what the Geneva convention says. Though people should not base their morality on law, even UN law.

You do not need to proclaim any zone to prepare for an enemy attack. The only need use of claiming an ADIZ is to propagandize that you are being ‘violated’ by perfectly legal behavior.

FIR is an ICAO concept relating to civil aviation. Military operations do not have to follow ICAO rules and FIR procedures, never mind request permission to enter a FIR zone in international airspace.

Even in regards to civilian aviation FIR airspace is not subject to the whims of the nation administering it (unless the airspace is also in their territorial airspace). Airlines can be banned for territorial airspaces not FIRs.

So no Incheon FIR is not internationally recognized as South Korea airspace.

Nor was the KADIZ set up to support Inceon FIR it was setup during the Korean war by USAF.

Having said that pretending to have an ADIZ is not illegal in itself as long as you do not take illegal actions in support of it. You can track planes via radar,ask them to identify themselves (they can ignore you) and even fly up to them in international airspace.

Though shooting even warning shots as they claimed they did in 2019 would be an illegal act of agression.

There is no such thing as Air Defence (Idetification) Zones in international law. Countries claiming to have one are trying to appropriate international airspace arbitrarily.

From a quick look at wikipedia S. Korea’s ADIZ seems to extend much much further than 12nmi from any land (incl. islands). It also obviously extends over N. Korea land which is obviously territory of N. Korea.

I’m not American, can someone explain why Biden does this when his “one job” for 2024 is to not look like a fash?

Is it though? Americans do not really care about foreigners getting killed. A lot are actually in favor of Israel killing people and/or Muslims being killed in general. It’s not a given he will lose more votes than he will gain from ‘moderate’ Republicans. After all Democrat voters will be whipped into line with the ‘but Trump/lesser evil’ argument. This’ sub’s mod has smeared himself up in shit and is going hard at it.