I don’t think they’d do much better besides being safer, eventually. Just saying that’s the only place where they’d make sense to go.

Edit: giving it a bit more thought, they should also have greater passenger capacity for their size

Thank you, thought I was taking crazy pills

Fair enough

Inner cities are better served by trolleys/buses anyhow. Self-driving taxis would work best at the edges of a city, or to fill gaps between train stations in suburbs

Firefox/Mozilla as an example is a bit of a stretch, given the fact that Mozilla Browser/Firefox is originally based on the open-sourced version of Netscape Navigator

To be fair, this was before the parties switched which was more left-wing and which was more right-wing in the 1960s. The democratic party of the 1800s was the explicitly racist, pro-slavery party.

America was executing the Trail of Tears

The president who did that even ignored the Supreme Court’s ruling to do so.

Been saying it since 2016

“De-privatize” is a really awkward phrasing for “nationalize”. Weird the way this article seems to dance around the word.

Quantity and quality aren’t the same, but it does feel inevitable that this would happen

He’d do that regardless. Not that it apparently matters now.

He didn’t need any substantial evidence last time. Just lies, repeated loudly and often with confidence and conviction.

Not sure I understand. They don’t call it until after the polls close. How could calling it after the polls close influence people’s political decisions?

The votes will be counted before electors are appointed. The news networks are just calling it in advance whenever it’s clear which way it will go. It’s their job.

Inner join and outer join were right there

Hey, don’t be sexist. There’s plenty of otherwise-tech-illiterate ditsy dudes in the same work pool.

My feed is aware of my politics and throws everyone I’m friends with or follow (and some who I’ve unfollowed) who wrote something objectively wrong or stupid that’s biased the other way politically.

It’s literally all rage bait unless I go in and manually block it from showing me those people at all.

Ah, you’re completely right.

If that person had a kid it’d be your third cousin, but since that person is OP’s parents’ second cousin, they are OP’s second cousin once removed.

For example, my great grandfather’s sister’s grandson was on the USS Thresher when it imploded. What would his relation be to me?

So your first common ancestors are your great great grandparents, so that’s third cousin, and they’re a generation older than you, so once removed. Third cousin once removed. EDIT: This was incorrect, it’s second cousin once removed since that person would be OP’s parent’s second cousin. See the replies below.

On that note, what do you call your grandparent’s sibling, vs your great grandparent’s sibling, and so on? Again, Google isn’t being very helpful here.

Grandparents’ siblings are you great aunts/great uncles, additional generations back you add more greats, so great grandparents’ siblings are your great great aunt/uncle. After a while people say “twice great” etc

I mean, they don’t HAVE to, but if they choose not to, the board of directors will push for a change in CSUITE personnel

If the board doesn’t maximize profit, the shareholders can sue them, so functionally they do have to.

Generally the app is better. Compatible with more container formats, audio formats (surround sound, Dolby digital, etc), and has hardware supported decoding for h265 video in addition to h264.