Apologize, but avoid relitigating the argument.

Apologize for raising your voice, even if she did it first. Apologize for not listening to her arguments, omit the triggering discussion.

You’re apologizing for your behavior that you think was unacceptable, nothing more.

Have a constructive conversation a little time after that. That’s when to bring up the trigger.

Just buy a new computer.

Documentation goes in the commit message.

That way you know when it was correct, because the next commit immediately makes it stale.

Immich, but a separated library.

I had a PM get really unhappy when they asked how confident I was with an estimate.

Apparently +/-100% upsets them.

American idle.

The asinine route I took was to authorise Google to deliver the file(s) to my OneDrive and then use one drive sync to download them.

There are benefits, the files are ‘backed up’ on another cloud; the process it entirely independent of you having a browser session.

I guess he can cry himself to sleep on the giant pile of money that he sold out to Unilever for.

The Lord’s work.

I was wondering why a pile of subs we being spammed with what looked like proper content from a banned user.

ill side of the human race Americans

Please don’t lump the rest of us in the Great American Dumpster Fire.

That looks like an XY problem.

The term “assassin” likely has roots in hashshāshīn (“hashish smokers or users”), a mispronunciation of the original Asāsiyyūn, but not a mispronunciation of Assasiyeen (pronounced “Asāsiyyeen”, the plural of “Asasi”). Originally referring to the methods of political control exercised by the Assasiyuun, one can see how it became “assassin” in several languages to describe similar activities anywhere.

Apparently by smoking.

“And if you keep interrupting me it’ll be even longer”

Apparently I am just an LLM running on an organic substrate.

Technically, it’s when an assassin does it.

An hour of CPU/brain time, not wall clock time.

No. Wait. Not like that.

Charlie Kirk, probably.

Try “repugnant” on for size… if it doesn’t work for you just pass it on to someone else.

I meant it doesn’t need to be perfect. It only needs to just barely as good as the people it replaces and appear cheaper on a balance sheet/cash flow statement for the quarter. Otherwise every service company wouldn’t be buying crap ‘AI’ chat bots for all customer facing duties.

Alternatively, self driving vehicles are probably already better than the bottom 50% of drivers in 50% of situations. I.e. driving on a road. We still want flawed human oversight of that.

Well, the employees it’s replacing are not perfect…

It just needs to be cheaper.

You are being scammed.