Why not just end the sentence with the word “weapon”? That’s the important part.
Why not just end the sentence with the word “weapon”? That’s the important part.
Nance’s prior arrest records indicated that he was previously arrested for aggravated discharge of a weapon involving a woman.
It needs to be specified if you discharge your weapon and a woman is involved? Because that’s…a different charge than if a man is involved? What if it’s a woman discharging the weapon? Still phrased like this? What a weird thing to write.
I mean, I don’t think the term SNAP is confusing. But if you’ve never used it, or don’t know anyone that used it, it’s worth defining for those people.
In the same way that there might be people who don’t know that the ACA = Obamacare, there might be people who don’t know that SNAP = food stamps. More and/or complete information isn’t a bad thing.
If it’s being sent over the cell phone carrier signal, does that mean if you’re at home, or otherwise connected to Wi-Fi, that you won’t get it?
James May in Japan? He went to a concert, but I can’t remember the time of day.