Do you not understand how bigger theoretical yield on investment = more development possibilities? I wasn’t really trying to get in an idiotic discussion of “You’re wrong”, “No you” about the advantages of nuclear power.
I just wanted to tell you your stupid theory about the Russians was befuddlingly retarded. For the purpose of nuclear power uranium supplies on earth may as well be infinite.
You do understand solar panels and wind mills have to be built, right? What do you think they’re made out of? Your comment is the most Reddit-esque snubby contrarian gotcha bs. “Other people have an opinion other than mine? No it must be the Russians trying to brainwash those dumber than me. I wouldn’t fall for it since I’m such a smart cookie.” Russians historically fueled anti nuclear protests and scares in Germany. There isn’t a uranium shortage to speak of.
In a new video you’re able to see all the players, including Hermoso, with Rubiales on the same bus laugh about this like it’s the funniest thing. That kind of thing is something you can’t reneg on. Hermoso literally lifted him off of his feet in the air right beforehand. The guy had just seen his team win. I don’t understand how you circlejerking idiots are making this out for “rape-culture”. Is it that you’re simply all kissless virgins? It was just a fucking kiss, not even something sexual. I suggest you crawl back into the cave you stumbled out of.
This bs made it impossible to buy sodium nitrite, which is a very useful reagent as an amateur chemist. Like really can’t we just start blaming the people that use chemicals irresponsibly instead of the chemicals themselves, like they’re some anthropomorphic inherent evil out to get you.
Dude, the Japanese nuclear waste water is barely radioactive. You receive a higher dose of radiation eating a fucking banana.
deleted by creator
“Sexism/Man-hate”
Then why is this important?
Why is it the first woman executed in 20 years instead of person?
Yes, but generally an economic welfare is derived from exploiting other countries in one way or another. If you aren’t willing to act on such moral depravity, someone else will be and outcompete you. People are able to justify anything to themselves morally, so the “I got mine” attitude makes sense to any sociopath out there.
I’m not referring to the compound or structure as a whole with this. Calling anything a moiety is just a way of singling out one specific part of a molecule, without it having to be a specific functional group in chemistry (like amines, alcohols, methoxy groups, halides, ketones, etc.). It’s sometimes also called a motif in the same way that repeating paterns in art can be a motif.
You’re right that I probably put that in a confusing way. What I meant is that methyl groups are mostly used in the context of methoxy groups and secondary (like methamphetamine) and tertiary amines/imines and ethers, but sometimes also with a carbon - carbon bond, which isn’t really the same thing.
A methyl group is the name given to single carbon (with 3 hydrogens attached) when substituted onto a larger chemical moiety (a structure or motif in chemistry). When people speak about methyl groups they’re mostly speaking about those single carbon methyl group being attached to a heteroatom (atoms other than carbon and hydrogen in organic chemistry, like nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur, etc.).
Methamphetamine (N-methylamphetamine or N-methyl alpha-methyl-phenyl-ethylamine in full form) has a methyl group on it’s amine (nitrogen or N-position), which drastically alters its psychological effects and the way it’s synthesized by chemists (requiring methylamine). The methyl group there prolonges the stimulating effects, while also providing serotonergic effects (generally euphoric effects caused by interaction with the serotonin receptor transport protein), which gives it much greater addiction potential.
Methyl groups in general don’t “make drugs stronger” like the other guy said. To consider drug receptor interaction you need to take into account how well a molecule fits into the receptor you’re targetting as a whole.
Please go and drink some then, if this is really what you think.
I think the tribalism thing you mention is more inherent self interest than actual stupidity. “If other people somewhere else are worse off, who cares as long as they are making your shoes and smartphones” type of deal.
It helps most in the sense that it’s not at all as unhealthy. Anything you hear to the contrary is simply scaremongering and terrible advice. Almost half of smokers die from smoking related illness where I live. The negative health effects and oxidative damage from pyrolysis and from vapourizing a liquid are simply not comparable.
deleted by creator