Also, that claim is hilarious, because the ICC prosecutor was a very strong supporter of Israel and an arguable Zionist prior to this. It’s actually why some are concerned he’s going to purposefully mess up this whole thing.

Except when the ICC announced Putin as a violator. Biden and Blinken were very happy and supportive of the ICC when that happened. The two of them even said at the time that the ICC has the international rule of law on its side and all signatories should follow its arrest requirements.

And people have been. A counter group was made called the Raven Mission that calls out explicitly pro-Zionism and pro-genocide people and their comments.

The police like to use the argument “are you near any police in any fashion? Then you’re interfering”.

“We do not need allies more devoted to order than to justice”
-Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

This one in particular is owned by the public, meaning the Berlin state government can control who is on the board and appoints the advisory committee.

So, yes, it is essentially state controlled.

So, what exactly does Minecraft (one of the primary games mentioned in the lawsuit) do to cause this? Because that seems like a major outlier compared to the other listed games.

It would help if the lawsuit was actually focused on lootboxes, microtransactions, and the like as harmful gambling.

But it doesn’t. The lawsuit claims video games themselves being good creates an addiction.

I mean, individual IDF soldiers have been uploading this sort of thing to their social media the whole time. They seem perfectly happy and proud of such footage.

It certainly is more mask off this time around. They aren’t trying to hide behind euphemistic slogans like “ethics in game journalism”. Now they are just blatantly open about their anger that women and minorities are being represented in games and how that’s a bad thing.

Probably referencing a meeting Biden had with the presidents of Mexico and Egypt recently and he mixed up who each of them was.

Hamas was not the one that killed her. And they weren’t using her as a shield whatsoever. Israel killed her AND targeted the ambulance they were fully aware was coming to save her, since they agreed to let it go and get her, but then killed the paramedics when they got there.

Did you miss how the Israeli government has been actively trying to censor Haaretz since they started doing proper journalism on what’s going on in Gaza? There was even a political attempt to get them shut down.

Why do y’all always use this argument? Are you seriously arguing that no one should ever criticize Biden for anything he does just because Republicans are worse?

Per Rule 2 here, I can’t post the full text myself, but here’s a comment over on a Reddit thread for the article that did do that.

Honestly, they’re doing both at the same time, I feel.

That would make a lot more sense if that’s what they meant. Since the governments “investigating” very clearly didn’t care about what happened to him.

So your response to teenagers throwing rocks is to gun them all down?

Sadly, we don’t care anyways when non-white people (or children) get killed here as it is.

By retweeting the new Human Rights Watch report, which ABC itself wrote an article on two hours prior to her retweet?

What sort of restriction could that at all violate?