I think that if space itself is what is rotating, then speed of light limit does not apply. But if it’s everything in the universe orbiting, as it were, a central point, then it would.
But if it is space itself rotating, then that would suggest some objective frame of reference outside the universe. Wouldn’t it?
Moving towards becoming a shit company, you mean.
That’s why I specifically quoted that part, so if I was misunderstanding you, you could have corrected me.
On that basis, I think we are substantially in agreement.
I don’t think you can blame the prosecutors for doing their jobs (assuming they’re not breaking the rules in how they do it) under that system.
So, what did you mean by this?
Yes, I see your reply. It doesn’t address my concern in any way.
At risk of repeating back to you what you already know, your argument reads that the system is necessary, and I agree. Also, the system is unfair. I also agree. Also that people who knowingly use the unfair system to hurt people unfairly caught in the system are not responsible for the unfairness. I disagree.
At this point, we should be trying to show each other why we believe what we believe. I, for example, would talk about how seal-clubbing is unfair, even if allowed by the rules. You might argue that anything allowed must be considered fair. (or you might argue something else, if I’m not properly understanding your position) We might learn from each other. We might not.
Also, why would you bring up something that I’ve already “admitted” in your parlance and tell it to me?
Because it’s central to my own point, and context helps make things clear?
What counterpoint did I raise to this argument when it was raised before?
I saw nothing that I observed as a counter-point.
I guess sharing a view with you is “admitting” something, since this needs to be an adversarial interaction and your point of view is presumed to be the “right” one that you’re trying to bring me around to
No, as I said above, we are working on mutual communication, leading hopefully to us both learning more about the issue under discussion.
Since “admitted” doesn’t work for you, what other word would you have me use? I’m trying to convey you knowing something, and saying that something, but not framing it in a way that communicates to me that you are thinking about it the same way I am, but are instead treating it as a minor point, or once detached from the immediate point, while I find it to be critical to the immediate point.
Your point number two admits the issue, but then you end by saying that you can’t blame the seal-clubbers for clubbing seals.
I agree that it’s not the fault of the prosecutors that the system is as it is. But it is their fault when they refuse to make allowances for the system being what it is.
Why are you lecturing me?
It’s what we traditionally refer to as “a discussion.” We hone our thoughts and opinions on each other’s until they match, or until we get tired of doing so, or until we decide we do not wish to, or cannot, learn any further from each other.
Prosecuting is fine. It’s when they have all the resources, and the defendant has a Public Defender getting paid practically nothing, and has practically no time to prepare, but the prosecution come at them like they are OJ Simpson that I have an issue.
I don’t think you can blame the prosecutors for doing their jobs (assuming they’re not breaking the rules in how they do it) under that system.
I think I can, too. This smacks of “just following orders,” or “just playing the game.” They knowingly and deliberately screw people for no good reason.
Yea, I asked the question before reading the article. Silly thing for me to do.
Yes, but we should also remember the past of independents running for office.
There is not an easy path to victory here.
I’m moderately citrus to know why we have caddisfly casings from the 1970s. Seems am odd thing to keep for so long.
I prefer the real Enterprise.
Removed by mod
He’ll be on a plane to el Salvador before the end of today. Depend upon it.
I’m sorry, let me explain what I meant by “at all.”
If a brain-dead MAGA cultists mouthbreather might suspect that you are “one of them brown people,” (you’ll forgive me for not using a term more accurate to their actual speech patterns) then you might reconsider. If you’re white, by the standards of people who still fly Confederate flags, you might do ok.
That said, I am given to understand that our immigration system is a nightmare, and expensive. I don’t know which nations might be easier or cheaper, but I recommend anywhere but here.
If you’re Arabic at all, it’s certainly unwise, and might be impossible to become an American citizen at this time.
On the other hand, I believe Trump is selling citizenship cards for 5 million dollars.
Can you imagine needing to pay a licensing fee in order to use the alphabet? Or your telling of Jack up the Beanstalk being subject to copyright?
I don’t think something can rotate relevant to itself. If all of reality was the earth, and nothing else, how can you tell if it’s spinning or not?
Please use small words if you try to answer this. I know a decent bit of applied physics, but once it turns to pure math, my head starts to swim.