I wish my instance would block you commie fucks

One is direct, and the other is not. And you’re right, one is not constructive, and the other is, that’s not coincidence.

What ‘immediate’ even means in this context I don’t know.

Yes, being indirect. Instead of saying: ‘you did a bad job’, say ‘here are things you can improve for next time’.

On is confrontational and problematic, the other diplomatic and constructive.

Everything the author describes can still be accomplished by being diplomatic and understanding without being confrontational and direct. Plus, you build a better, more resilient team that way.

I’m not really sure the author learnt what he thought he learnt.

Yeah, you and three others…

Sounds like a meteor hit Earth, saved you a click

thank you guy

Oh, too many cars! Absolutely, makes sense…

What kind of rat is fine with scammers?

Of course you are…

Mm, is that why Silent Hill 2 sits on ‘Overmevmingly positive’ while still plagued by serious performance issues?

The statement is simply not true; gamers are willing to swallow just about anything if sold correctly.

I never said anything about exactly what makes a good hunter. I was making a counterpoint to the quote of the article

Nowhere does it definitely state that’s the case. In fact, the data doesn’t even support that claim since women should excel at ultra marathons, but they don’t. In fact, women don’t excel in any running exercise that I can find.

Sure. But you then need to show the data that supports those points

I was asking the commenter to explain what a ‘better’ runner is supposed to mean? And tou perhaps was answering something else…

That may be, who knows (without supprting evidence)? But see, things is, I don’t think hearsay is what a good article in Scientific American should be based on.

What? I just looked at the records for ultramarathons, and there is not a single instance of women beating men for their respective runs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultramarathon?wprov=sfla1

I just looked at the measured data and came to a conclusion. I don’t even know what conclusion you’re trying to communicate, but it beats me…

Ok, better how, you mean?

Mounting evidence from exercise science indicates that women are physiologically better suited than men to endurance efforts such as running marathons.

Looking at marathon athletic records; that’s not at all true and took me about 3 min to verify. In fact, out of all the top 25 record times, all are by men (and almost all Kenyan and Ethiopian men).

What is this tripe? They could at least try to be serious…

It clearly isn’t!

A) Man has dreamt of Artificial Intelligence for decades now, often times very much realizing the capabilities (and dangers) of such technology B) AI in its current form already support business, hobbies, creative work etc. The traffic and processing power needed is constantly rising.

I feel with a such a bold (and just incorrect) statement the article cannot be much worth to read.