Christopher Nolan is pretty passionate about film. As far as I’m aware, he won’t shoot on digital
Christopher Nolan is pretty passionate about film. As far as I’m aware, he won’t shoot on digital
I offered to do the same and was literally scoffed at, then reprimanded for my audacity. It was a really fucking shitty experience.
While true, it definitely depends on your particular TSA team. I have flown multiple times with firearms within the US, and normally TSA follows their own rules pretty well. However, I have had TSA DEMAND my key so they could open the case outside of my presence. When I protested and gave them the handout of their own procedures, the guy said “you can give me the key, or you don’t get on your flight.”
Ah, yes. The totally relevant story about a celebrity bicycle accident in World News…
You keep at it, buddy
You have a very Mary Louise Parker look
It’s “orange” and “oil”
Was that intentionally a Fiona Apple reference?
You said “dimes” twice.
We like dimes.
And further down, the real reason: they want neighboring cartels to pick up the slack of fent manufacturing so the DEA will eliminate their rivals for them
The only piece to this puzzle I didn’t have is in your first link.
Biggs received a medical discharge from the Army when he was 28
Cool, so he didn’t have 20 years AND he isn’t retired; he was medically discharged. These two factors absolutely remove him from consideration of punishment under the UCMJ. Nice detective work there!
You should take the “(Ret.)” out behind his name so as not to mislead though.
I don’t know the context behind the excerpt they posted
That’s the problem; they didn’t post the context that would demonstrate he is not subject to the UCMJ as a veteran. Some retirees may be subject to the UCMJ, but in general, the UCMJ applies to active duty military. I’m a veteran with legal experience, not a lawyer, so I’m willing to be corrected with facts from someone who knows and isn’t just repeating bullshit they heard on social media.
The elements of this crime have several different acts which qualify; you don’t have to do all of them to be guilty. The preface (which was cut off) denotes which people are subject to punishment under this law, which would almost certainly NOT include Biggs.
He doesn’t fit element A, so this whole discussion is moot. Please stop spreading misinformation. Also, if you’re gonna cite the UCMJ, cite the corresponding statute number (Article 94). Also, it helps if you spell UCMJ correctly
A story of Maurizio Gucci’s secret life
But Georgia…
The “standard language” thing sounds right to me. A lot of court filings templates and attorneys just plug in the facts for their particular submission.
Which unfortunately reminds me of Mad Libs, and now this is all getting pretty absurd in my head
I also prefer my threats of violence to be vague and unactionable.
I’ll see you soon.
I haven’t seen anything from this season yet, but if it’s even close to as good as the first two seasons, it’ll still be one of the best shows on TV
I also use Voyager, and the only requirement it doesn’t meet is blocking domains/sources (like, say anything by the New York Post).
Unless that feature exists and I’m just not aware…