Yeah I have live YouTube TV and they no longer offer the MLB channel. I had got comfortable with You Tube in general because for years I have been watching the regular YouTube and I am paying for Premium, so there are no commercials. The only ads that you have to fast forward through are the ones embedded in the videos by the creators. The billing for both regular YouTube Premium and their TV product is smooth and hassle free. I have never sampled Plex or Hulu and just was wondering how they compare with the YouTube TV product. Regular Youtube has an MLB channel that I am subscribed to. They have game highlights.

I’m coming from Comcast cable. I choose YouTube TV and miss the MLB channel. Not the full slate of games. Just the MLB channel. Does Hulu have it?

Well depending on your sources for news you will get simple facts or a scenario where facts are censored because they don’t conform with the narrative

this is the link to the full movie

https://rumble.com/v3vyvzv-the-fall-of-minneapolis.html

I will agree with your “moving the goal posts” comment. But my point is still that we all lived through a media barrage with everything positive about the vax. Even after they had to retract what they initially told us about it protecting you and others. Yet there has been no significant reporting on adverse effects. And I should mention I got the vax early on with zero side effects.

Can you site one broadcast or cable news program (other than Fox) that has ever mentioned this issue? Or the NYT or Washington Post?

You are reinforcing my the point that I made. Yes there is a sizeable group of people who are vax hesitant but the majority of the media never presents the occurrences when there is a bad outcome caused by the vax or boosters.

If you take the few minutes to read the article you will note that no one mentioned refutes the facts reported in the article. Very sad that we are fed a narrative where the facts are no longer relevatn

I don’t believe that there are a significant amount of people experiencing severe side effects from vax or booster. But I find it absurd that government and media sources suppress the instances when they do occur. People should make their own risk assessment based on facts and not a false narrative

Just another example of unequal justice. And many are finally realizing it.

though I’m sure it exists I do not have a link to specific data. but I did see something just the other day about Austin, Texas. It showed basically a cut of one third in funding and approximately a doubling in crime. But the specific percentages are not critical because this is a common sense issue. Less cops more crime. Then add to it that in cities that do defund the remaining police force realizes that the city administration does not “have their back” while they are doing their job. So police there are less inclined to do their job because they fear the possible illogical retribution for simply doing their job.

No and that is why I characterized it as a generalization.

Take defunding police as an example. Everywhere this has been done crime has significantly increased. Yet that basic correlation of less police equals more crime is denied. Other non relevant factors are given as to why we have a spike in crime. If you desire to remain part of a group because you believe it gives your life meaning is strong enough you will reject the undeniable facts and believe the delusion. And it is ironic that some of the comments posted here seem to be from people who don’t even realize that the original premise is about them and anyone who simply toes the line of the group rather than evaluating if a policy that they endorse actually works.

It is not anti anything specific. It simply points out that if you follow any ideology that consistently does not produce a solution to a problem it might be time to rethink your position. In everyday life we see many things getting worse than they were. We are then told that those bad outcomes are not due to bad policies, but to various other factors that have nothing to do with the issue. This is a complete generalization but is seems to me that conservatives more than other groups deal with outcomes and not policies that simply make them feel good about themselves.

the exact same thing would happen on reddit which is why their flair policy stops every even remotely political opinion from turning into a shit show. I am not endorsing or condemning reddit or lemmy but simply pointing out the differences so far.

This conversation just confirms why I stay out of political groups. As a moderate I incorrectly thought that I could make an observation without it somehow being viewed as some kind of heresy.

Those were my observations NOT accusations. Anyone can do a site search of lemmy and make their own determination of how many conservative groups that currently exist. This appears to be the only one. Then note the level of activity in this one remaining group. Lemmy like reddit can run things however they want so I am not condemning lemmy just noting my observations.

Excellent question. Any time my power goes out I know that i have to unplug my PC to get it to wake up

he’s a famous actor - Paul Muni