I have a lot of university stuff going on but I will try in the next week or so. If I don’t respond, DM me.
I have a lot of university stuff going on but I will try in the next week or so. If I don’t respond, DM me.
Thank you for the reply! I did not want to be mean, rather explain why many people would downvote this post. Welcome to Lemmy!
I am not a fan of at best non-descriptive, at worst clickbait titles with one-sentence post bodies.
Search for webcompat
Thank you for providing the technical answer here, as well as the warning.
But Android has far more users than FF.
“only has permissions for necessary domains”
any page
ò_ô
Wait, does FF on Android only support Manifest v3 extensions?
Valid question. Im short: They will stop working.
You are getting downvoted for the question because most people here think that you shouldn’t use them. And they might be right.
According to your logic, 30% of words would satisfy this property.
- Accordion
- Antenna
- Banana
- Character
- Deceived
- Elephant
- Greening
- Harbinger
- Insignia
- Knowledge
GPT-4, prompt: “List 10 words that start and end with the same letter but are not palindromes.”
Even without the palindrome condition, it got some of these and a few palindromes.
What is your distro?
You could write a macro/userscript(Grease/TemperMonkey? idk) that does your manual steps automcatically?
I am sceptical. The paradox of ‘DoNotTrack’ is, that this setting is used to track you; it gets ignored and, as most users do not have it enabled, makes you more unique.
Someone said, that this new setting is legally enforcable in California. We shall see how it applies to the rest of the world.
FYI Kagi has an integrated Blocker/Upranker/Downranker similar to this. Under their stats page you can see, which domains have been blockes/raised/… the most.
The most hated one by far: Pinterest and all locale-specific sub-domains.
research:
userChrome.css firefox
custom css firefox
firefoxPorn subreddit
While it can be somewhat cynical to play out environmental vs social issues, I agree with the scepticism here.
No matter how you extract the code, this will be hacky. The problem with this approach is that you are entirely dependent on the YouTube backend. They will not notify you when they change their code/API. They will not comment their code.
In the past, this has led to a considerable development investment of projects like NewPipe where they have to fix somethong every few months as there is a backend change.
I am still thinking about your problem, but I am unsure whether the approach of extracting from JS works (mid term).
Why not do the steps you outlined above as a macro on your keyboard? This eliminates the need for JS. To extract the video URL, you could use some RegEx automatically or
Ctrl+F
. Just some thoughts. I am still invested into this weird request :)