Wars are by definition lawful. Sorry you’re wrong
It’s also not a twisted definition. It’s the literal dictionary definition that all countries use when defining terrorism.
And no, if war time acts were not lawful, all war is terrorism which it isn’t so again you’re wrong.
Israel can’t be called terrorism because terrorism must be—by definition—unlawful
the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
Emphasis mine.
“Hey so I know we’ve been doing a genocide but look, we’re being really nice when we bomb innocent civilians homes by letting them know we’re going to bomb their homes.”
This (a) doesn’t excuse literal genocide and (b) is just a “nicer” version of exactly the thing they’re appalled Hamas just did. You don’t get to cry foul if you’re going to retaliate with a tit for tat play.
They are terrorists. That’s literally what they are. The fact that attacked an evil fascist state’s city doesn’t change that.
We need to start living by the “see a racist/Nazi, punch a racist/Nazi” standard.
Constitutional protections such as the first amendment apply to minors as well.
The term dreads or dreadlocks is considered pretty racist depending on who you ask. But I’m not black so honestly wouldn’t take my word on the topic as gospel at all.
This is actually false. Students do indeed have constitutional rights. And you must meet the same strict scrutiny standard to restrict them.
How do we get this to be a thing? Because this is glorious
100% this. Things won’t change until we drag out the guillotines.
Except for when it’s very important to Russia.
I mean… Jan 6 says all you need to know about whether he’ll ever be charged.
Trade is not barter. And if it involved coinage or it isn’t barter. It’s a form of market economy.
Market Economy ≠ Barter
Actually there is in American law. He actively aided and abetted an enemy of the state he is a citizen. That’s called treason.
Where did I mention the 16th or 19th centuries? And mercantilism was 100% not a barter economy. It was a form of market economy controlled by the state… so I’m pretty sure it’s you who misunderstands what mercantilism is.
This “barter” economy as a primary means of exchange never existed. It’s a myth and a lie created by capitalists (actually by one Adam Smith) trying to rationalize the adoption of coinage and currency in ancient civilization.
In fact barter economies tend to arise predominantly in capitalism during periods of economic instability. Ie: after natural disasters, in war torn countries, etc.
The proper term you are looking for is “gift economy” and it is how the world worked before capitalism. I want something from you so you gift it to me with the implicit understanding that if in the future the roles are reversed I give something to you of relatively equal perceived value.
It was actually pretty rare that gifts were paid back in full in one transaction and often larger gifts were paid back through a series of transactions.
So what your saying is the gun was drawn after she showed signs of non-violent escape?
Anything else is apologetics.
I consider cops being “removed from duty” a net benefit to society so…
It’s also a massive waste of money and resources that could be used to fight actual, real crime.
War crimes are explicitly not terrorism by definition. If you need a basic high school education though there’s hopefully a public school near you. This subject and topic is covered under civics.