That’s what the Germans thought in 1933

Let the loud mouthed Marxists finally carry out the revolution they’ve been babbling about for the past 10 years. Oh wait…

You don’t need to voice out your sensitivity to certain situations when you can just remove yourself from it. OP’s coworker is a bitch.

I can understand not wanting to hear a constant barrage of swear words, but getting triggered at someone’s outburst of frustration expressed as a swearword is lame shit.

No. It just means they have some maturity about them

I would censor the work f–k

Instance checks out

It doesn’t seem to me that OP’s coworker had an issue with professionalism. Rather, they seem to have been triggered by the use of the word

Getting offended by “fuck” is very sensitive behaviour

Appreciate the recommendations man. I’ll be sure to check em out

No reason at all. It just sounded better in my head

Fair enough then. These are the criticisms I’ve heard from people on the right though. I just wanted some clarification. Thanks!

Is that what you wanted me to say? Look man, I’m not a Conservative nor am i even American. Like i said, I’ve just been following the US election, and have been engaging in media from both sides. It’s possible that i have been “tricked” by the Republicans, but i was simply asking a question while both making some assumptions and stating a fact. And with the fracking:

Here’s her saying she is 100% in favour of banning fracking.

Here’s her backtracking on that

So clearly your claim “Harris did not make her personal position on fracking clear…” is false.

Also, where did you get the “everybody lies, so Trump’s not so bad i guess” from in my post. If you go back, and put on your reading glasses to see what i wrote, you’ll see that i was asking why people bring up Kamala’s “lies” when Trump is even worse of a liar.

This is a perspective i have never seen before. While his methods still seem underhanded. It at least provides some logical basis as to why people still support Trump in spite of his lies

I wasn’t laundering any false premises. I was only stating the fact that she has lied. I don’t doubt this because she IS a politician after all. The examples i used are things which the Republicans have brought up as “lies” which i acknowledge, and i assumed everyone also acknowledged. Of course, you’re free to disagree but I wasn’t trying to launder any false premises here.

You are right. I get too obsessed with objectivity sometimes, but it seems like there’s no such thing as the right choice only the one that’s best for me

I never really cared for politics until very recently, so i always thought its discourse would be grounded in logic and not logical fallacies. So i am quite shocked.

It’s so widespread though which is what baffles me. Even political commentators i used to follow when i was still a young conservative make arguments like this. Surely they can’t all be this dumb.

raised as a counter-argument by liberals in debates on taxation.

Which liberals are defending heavy taxation of the working class?

Fax. This is how it should be done. Now we just need to wait for someone to program this

I think I understand now. Thanks.

That is one hell of an analogy