Because it does not play into stereotypes hence is needlessly specific. Say white man conjures the image of an establishment elitist who has unrealistic standards for being a scientist (being white, male, well off)
Because it does not play into stereotypes hence is needlessly specific. Say white man conjures the image of an establishment elitist who has unrealistic standards for being a scientist (being white, male, well off)
If you studied a technical science and do coding for that you may be allowed to be called ingenieur.
That’s some title gore. Thought he escaped at first.
Don’t declare more than 1 pointer per line. This resolves that, badly.
We don’t know any economical way to synthesise helium. Nuclear fusion exists.
Because 20 of 22 % of voters not caring is much more.
10 % of voters wavering is not a lot though.
Because you are old. Also this is to help young people understand better. We will not convince the fossils.
Retard used to be the nice word back in the day. Language evolves and people suck. It can be difficult to accept both.
While this is true, editing posts to avoid controversy is weird. They wrote what they wrote and noone can change that. Can’t unsay something, too. This also makes this conversation difficult to read for future passerbys.
That was 30+ years ago, no?
Yeah, bur that’s not newsworthy.
You clearly do not know how the german legislative process works.
Depleted uranium is not much different from lead. Heavy metals are unhealthy. It is barely radioactive as it is made from the rather stable uranium isotopes. (Hence depleted)
Pun intended?
Ok, but why did you not use emplace?
You forgot the /s. A lot of humans exist.
Pointers are great for optional references.