There’s no way a US president is going to stop supporting Israel. She would do the same thing, even if she were not the vice-president.
There’s no way a US president is going to stop supporting Israel. She would do the same thing, even if she were not the vice-president.
I’m not sure, but I think that might have been part of the joke, seeing all the comments here.
The f in foss is for free as in libre, not price. And I imagine it is used to avoid touching the topic of open source software vs libre software. So saying you can make money from one and not the other doesn’t make sense.
With the assumption that we now measure inclines of course
I interpreted your reply to njm1314 as meaning “we don’t need to measure inclination to cheat, we can do that by simply increasing our precision”
deleted by creator
That would work for the perimeter, but not for the area.
I’m just picking on a point that’s not relevant to your comment’s core idea, I’m not saying we shouldn’t share software or other goods and services with worker coops:
worker coops, which don’t violate workers’ rights.
Under capitalism worker cooperatives will also violate the rights of its workers even if less than traditional companies, because that’s what capitalism demands for their survival on the market.
I think it’s kind of challenging to legally define what makes a party “worthy” of making use of the software or digital work. I think you would need to go on a case-by-case basis, but at that point it probably makes more sense to just make software source-available and actively encourage people to reach out to you to get permission to use the software and to modify and redistribute it.
a degree in game programming
That’s a thing?
that considers the rights of both software users and developers unlike copyleft
Kind of in the vein of what Redis attempted to with its relicense to SSPL
When people say perl, they normally mean Perl 5. Perl 6 is now called Raku and is considered a different language.
If it’s like Lisp, then ?
is just part of the symbol and doesn’t have any special syntatic meaning. In different Lisps it’s also convention to end predicate names with a ?
or with P
(p for predicate)
I think this is a sort of anti-license, so I think the sort of people who use it reject copyright law.
If you have a fever.
deleted by creator
Is there any situation where you’d want to remember the opcodes? Disassemblers should give you user-friendly assembly code, without any need to look at the raw numbers. Maybe it’s useful to remember which instructions are pseudo instructions (so you know stuff like jz
(jump if zero) being the same as je
(jump if equal) making it easier to understand the disassembly), but I don’t think you need to remember the opcode numbers for that.
Edit: Maybe with malware analysis where the malware in question may be obfuscated in interesting ways to make the job of binary analysis harder?
deleted by creator
they break with monospacedness
The IDEs I’ve used had the ligatures be of the same character width as the original operator.
Why are you casting to void*
? How is the compiler supposed to know the size of the data you are dereferencing?
lemmy.ml has non-unicode emojis?