The ranges will become larger over time because “we have it”, and companies will get thousands of sections with figuratively unlimited IP addresses in them each.
Somewhere between Linux woes, gaming, open source, 3D printing, recreational coding, and occasional ranting.
🇬🇧 / 🇩🇪
The ranges will become larger over time because “we have it”, and companies will get thousands of sections with figuratively unlimited IP addresses in them each.
With this huge ranges we’ll have the same problem with IPv6 in a few years that we already have with IPv4.
They not only force their user to buy their crap, they also intentionally and maliciously frame the AGPL in a certain way.
The more every fucking site shoves that down my throat at every login, the more I am not willing to even look at it.
Spicy Pillow!
They want you to use their partnered sites instead of adding your own.
Having actual tabs instead of huge buttons would be an upgrade, too.
Didn’t they move to Microsoft for hosting quite some time ago?
I did not, but of course you can. Either by using an adapter (maybe a printable one?), or – if it is an SSD – by just placing the drive there and hld it in place with one screw.
If there already is a drive installed you want to removed and there is no spare cover, you can also print one.
(You can of course buy the parts instead of printing them. Those adapters and covers are fully standardized and widely available.)
You could use dd
to create full disk images. This maintains everything.
There’s ydotool.
Absolutely none. On my setup everything runs fine either natively or with Xwayland.
I feel like nowadays it’s more specific web servers instead of a general purpose one. Also containerization often is a thing.
I wish you wouldn’t use GitHub but an open source forge, though.
You summarize it quite well. But I would still recommend Arch (but as an Arch user since 2008 I am biased on this). Why?
And since you’re coming from Windows, you have to learn new stuff anyways. So why not dive head first into Arch?
So at least 22 papers from the study were AI generated and not checked afterwards.
This says more about the authors the AI users who claim authorship than about AI.
Why do you consider AppImages as last resort?
Mainly because you cannot manage them properly.
Installing from the repos I have pacman, from the AUR I can use one of the various AUR helpers (most of them can forward repo package updates to pacman, so I really have just one command to update the system and all AUR packages).
When making my own packages I usually also put them in the AUR (plus, it is super easy to do make an own package and put in in the AUR) – and from there an aUR helper takes care about updates. Flatpaks can also be updated very easy by just running one command.
So: All of those have a specific location where they install and allow me to start them easily because they put a script/link somewhere in $PATH
. All of those can be easily maintained and updated.
Last time I checked, AppImages had none of those. Neither could I easily update all of them on my system, nor is there a dedicated location to place them, nor is there an “unified” (i.e. something in $PATH
) way of starting them. I have to manually check for updates, re-download the whole thing, replace the current AppImage file in an arbitrary location.
This is just how I do not want to maintain my programs.
My personal order:
Repositories > AUR > Making an own AUR package > Making an own package not in AUR > Flatpak > Using an alternative to that application > consider if I really need it > AppImage
Disabled by default, as of yet.
Yet.
Like there already is one for IPv4 addresses?
I stand by my point:
No-one will ever need a /48 range.