Yeah, that’s not true. Pangaea is a libtard hoax designed by the globalists to make you think the world was smaller at a time and normalise everyday Americans losing their jobs to China. In reality China has always been this far away and stone age American traders would have also had high import tax on shoddy imported axes and knives.

I do too FWIW, but big brutalist concrete constructions definitely give dystopian vibes imo.

You think investigative journalism isn’t worthy?

Look dystopian, not are dystopian. They’re big grey concrete towers, now I personally dig the look, but it’s hard to get away from.

They look dystopian

Just assign tab to 4 spaces.

I kinda just hold it all in my head and fix stuff when I notice it’s broken.

Aaah aaaaaaaaah aaaAaaaah aaaaaaaaah aaaAaaaah fuck this shit, fuck it all fuck it fuck it fuck it.

I uSE aRcH Btw

It is, you just have an idea, do some art and then glue it together with code.

Or until they’ll have an update on what happened/happens.

I disagree about the table - if you’re interacting regularly across timezones you tend to convert everything to your local time anyway - India’s on lunch at 9am, US is starting at 14:00, because that’s how it fits into your day.

Best I’ve seen is a process scheduled on UK local time (including hour changes) running on a server that maintains Eastern local (including hour changes) but the process logs in EST ( and does not move with the hour)

WHAT DID YOU SAY?

To be fair you can totally bind an arbitrary number of spaces to tab in vi. I’ll dig out the syntax highlighting file some time. Oh and I use vim really.

There are no pros to tabs. Configure tabs to a number of spaces.

I use vi without syntax highlighting.

See mate, the mint make a profit on money, do you think it costs £50 to run off one of them little plastic things.

Edit: just realised you were one of our dear Canadian brethren. See hoser, the Canadian mint make a profit on money, you think it costs a loonie to strike of them little metal things?

Well that’s kind of what I’m asking, is there something obvious I’m missing? Russia don’t look capable of escalating, they’re not even making inroads into Ukraine. A couple of squadrons of F35s would make a significant dent in Russian progress in Ukraine, but no-one even seems super keen to send F16s.

I’m genuinely curious what scenario they’re currently seeing where a few hundred thousand troops are going to be necessary soon?

No, absolutely I don’t think they should let them have any of it, I’m not sure how that could be read into my comment.

Equally NATO have in no way indicated they have any plans of setting foot in Ukraine and outright said they won’t. None of which explains why senior military leaders in the UK are saying they need to be able to raise an armed force double what they have at the minute, why nukes are being stationed in the UK or why Sweden are foreseeing land war in Europe.