What a twist
What a twist
What if you only have a nail?
Sounds like you need to add some sleep statements somewhere in your deployment scripts if you want to deploy in 10 seconds
Then it asks if you are John Connor
Users are the acceptance testers.
No worries, sounds like you’re definitely on the right track with your approach.
In terms of the style of editor I don’t have a strong preference, I think the most important thing is discoverability which generally means putting docs where they are expected to be found and using whatever your team or org is using. Personally I have a slight preference for markdown mainly because it’s easy to version control, see who wrote what (so I can ask them questions) and use all the tools I’m used to that work well with plain text. Tools that use more WYSIWYG style can be good too though and many of them like Notion have the advantage of making it relatively easy to search across your entire companies documentation assuming everyone uses the one tool.
For my personal notes I use Logseq which I highly recommend. It’s a bit of both, markdown under the hood but with a simple editor that lets you focus on writing notes, tasks and links.
I would say as a new junior dev you are uniquely placed to help with this. Documentation tends to be written by people who know a lot about a thing and they try to imagine what might be useful for someone. Someone new coming in with a fresh perspective can help uncover assumed knowledge or missing leaps to make the documentation better. One of the common onboarding steps I’ve seen is to go back and update/improve the onboarding docs after you’ve just been onboarded for example.
I would say pick your battles though because documentation can be a never ending task and documents are almost always out of date shortly after they are written. Think about what would have saved you time or mental overhead if it was just written down and fix those first.
As far as organising and writing, every place is different and it can depend on the tools your org is using. In general I’d at least have links to relevant docs as close to where they might be needed as possible. Like how to set up and get up and running with a code base should probably be documented directly in the readme, or at least linked to if it’s overly complicated.
Hopefully that’s at least somewhat helpful. It’s definitely a problem basically everywhere I have worked though, you have to do what you can and not stress too much about it.
I dunno, it’s already pretty good at writing code and only going to get better. I agree with your conclusion though, mainly because as a software engineer writing code is actually not even the most complicated part of the job. If an AI could write perfect code every time it’d make my job a lot easier but I’d still have to do a significant amount of work such as:
That’s just off the top of my head, I’m sure I’ve missed some things. As much as I love writing code I honestly feel like if an AI could do that part it’d just take stress out of my day and give me more time to focus on those other parts of the job. Of course in reality more work would probably just be piled on but that’s just life I guess.
One might even say it’s an ExtremelyDrawnOutMethodNamesFactoryImpl
Almost certainly
The great thing about schema-less databases is you can put any old thing in there. The bad thing is at some point you have to get it back out again.
They should make another game while they’re at it. Escape From Butcher Bay was heaps of fun back in the day.
Or just !!
for the last command. Particularly helpful if you forgot to prefix it with sudo
you can run sudo !!
I’ve been using Atuin on my work computer and found it to be pretty good if you want something a bit fancier than Ctrl + R
There is a lot of good stuff there but it’s still opaque when it comes to bias specifically. I mean, am I missing somether here? I genuinely feel like there must be a whole section I’ve missed or something based on some of the other commenters. The bias methodology is no more a methodology than “grind up some wheat, mix some water and yeast before chucking it in the oven for a bit” is a recipe for bread. You rate 4 categories from 0 - 10 and average it, but the ratings themselves are totally subjective.
Story Choices: Does the source report news from both sides, or do they only publish one side.
What does this even mean? If a site runs stories covering the IPCC recommendations for climate action but doesn’t run some right wing conspiracy version of how climate change is a hoax, is that biased story selection?
What did I miss here?
Good summary. I think the first point is the most concerning because it’s actively spreading misinformation and giving the appearance of credibility.
The clockers born starin’ at an empty plate
Momma’s torn hands cover her sunken face
We hungry but them belly full
The structure is set ya neva change it with a ballot pull
// This function calculates applicable discounts given a customer's loyalty status
// STOP BEFORE SEASON 8 DEXTER PLEASE
fun calculateDiscountRate(loyalty: LoyaltyStatus): Set<Discount> {
// No seriously you can hide out at my place if you need to just please don't let them do it
...
Seems like it’d be a lot easier to do that the other way around. Then again there are probably a lot of forms to fill out
If you have the stones to try it