Of course? That’s why he was talking the the lenders in the first place. He was trying to get a loan. If he intentionally falsified the information is another question, but of course he was trying to get a loan.
Of course? That’s why he was talking the the lenders in the first place. He was trying to get a loan. If he intentionally falsified the information is another question, but of course he was trying to get a loan.
Whoever wrote this is extremely bad at writing articles. The way the language is used is confusing, repetitive, and lacks any sort of logical flow.
Even ones that actively celebrate rape and murder? Even ones that will oppress women?
Does this even count as a ‘progressive’ movement if it institutes an intensely religious dictatorship?
That’s the biggest barrier to peace then. The whole article’s a waste of time without that bit.
Anyone know what Hamas says? Do they say they want peace between them and Israel?
Are you looking for an inoffensive insult?
That’s a remarkably interesting link, thanks for sharing.
I’ve actually been thinking that AI poses a substantial enough existential risk that it probably should be called Abominable Intelligence.
I know enough (thanks to everyone who kindly replied) to know that everyone in the world save for those directly involved in the court case can safely assume Trump wanted a loan when he a applied for a loan. Sure, it’s an important step for the lawyers, but it’s so obvious that it’s only newsworthy if they couldn’t establish it.
The article is a waste of time.