https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought-terminating_cliché

As the party fielded more and more candidates who championed economic-right policies in order to attract corporate donations, the idea of “purity testing” was turned into a stock phrase to attack critics using labels, instead of justifying it on its own terms.

Phrases like “moral purity” now serve two functions: firstly, to dismiss criticisms from the Left wholesale without having to discuss them directly, and secondly, to blame them for the rise of fascism.

In theory it was also supposed to serve a third function of bullying the Left into voting Democrat, but that didn’t work.

  • kadu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Does anybody “work with” us on the left or are we the only ones that need to sustain this fallacy and always compromise, to the point we no longer are even being represented?

    • MonkRome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      25 minutes ago

      Who is “us”, are they supposed to reach through your computer screen? I’ve done activism on and off for years, every time I put in the effort it yields results from the Dems, left leaning or not. If you want our side to win, you have to put in the work. You can’t expect the Dems to work with you if you’re not along side them doing the work as well. Your responsibility doesn’t start and end at the voting booth.

    • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      What is there to work with though? There’s no cohesive movement on the left to speak of so which of the umpteen factions would they start with? We’d need to think and vote as a much bigger bloc for the left to get the kind of representation we want.